this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
592 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

84866 readers
5350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 169 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (6 children)

The Chinese AI labs are really trying to pop the bubble, too.

How?

Well lemme ask you this. What if models 80-90% as good as Claude, with weights just thrown out there for any provider (or homelab) to host, flood the market? What if they're so dirt cheap to run, they're almost free, and don't even need Nvidia GPUs? What they need fewer resources to run with each update, instead of more?

...What if this already happened, and Big Tech is maddly lobbying to ban/censor them before people realize it, and that the "infinite scaling" thing is a big fat lie?

That's the state of things.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It turns out that off-shoring your economy to a political rival is a really dumb thing for a capitalist to do.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

But, but, this quarter profits.

[–] zeroConnection@programming.dev 37 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Yep, the Chinese models are already up 10 times cheaper and now that Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google, all are increasing prices up to 10 more for models like Opus, it will make Chinese models anywhere from 50 to 100 times cheaper.

American corps. are betting that since people have their workflow already established they won't switch to other providers, but that's not the case. There's already a mass move to Chinese models.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

People keep talking about Chinese models, where are they? How do I used them instead of Claude? Are they safe?

[–] TrumpetX@programming.dev 2 points 21 minutes ago

Look into zen.ai which is opencode's sister company that provides llm access. "At cost"

You can see just how cheap they are. I use Augment Code at work and they have kimi 2.6. It's really solid. Opus/GPT are still better, but for many tasks, kimi works great and doesn't make me cringe at the price.

Qwen 3.6 is supposed to be really good too. I haven't used it that much.

[–] nbsp@programming.dev 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

ollama or llama.cpp to self host if you have a good mac or good video card. this is perfectly safe.

there are a bazillion hosted inference providers to choose from https://huggingface.co/docs/inference-providers/en/index be aware that you are sending your code to fuck knows who and they are sending back fuck knows what. ymmv, yolo.

hook one of them up to opencode.ai or pi.dev or one of the bazillion other 'harneses' or whatever we are calling it this week and try not to rm -r anything important.

for a good time try and get a chinese models to say something about tibet, or taiwan... its like having your own virtual tankie tamagochi!

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

be aware that you are sending your code to fuck knows who and they are sending back fuck knows what

So literally the same as Western-made AI?

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah only the Chinese government is currently far better at working behind the scenes with companies than any other government in the world?

Incompetence is a feature of governments at times.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago

I trust the Chinese government more than American tech corporations. One side is socialist, the other side is fascist.

[–] nbsp@programming.dev 6 points 8 hours ago

inference providers could be anyone from anywhere, there are even proxy resellers. some are harvesting and reselling your data.

if you send your code to claude/openai/google there is certainly a much higher degree of confidence in who you are sending your data to. yes they to harvest your data and can send you malicious commands (esp if you have a promp injection attack).

its like buying a cheap vps, if the stakes are low its fine, if it important then you need to consider about the consequences of your actions.

nb: i am no expert, just fucking around.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The most famous is Deepseek. It's not even made by "AI" company, it was a side hustle from stock trading company. They released it for free just to flex.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Liu Wen tends to be in China

[–] zeroConnection@programming.dev 4 points 10 hours ago

I hear people use minimax as replacement for sonnet and deepseek as replacement for opus, both can be used directly in Claude code instead of Anthropic models

[–] new_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Check Ollama dot com

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 30 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

In a way it has actually.

Deepseek was big because not only did they publish the full model for everyone to use, but the MoE structure significantly brought down the hardware requirements in terms of processing power. As long as you have enough VRAM, you can run it on older hardware with no need for the latest Nvidia stuff.

Now they got v4 which many have found to be within a 10% margin of Claude and ChatGPT.

On top of that, China has cheapo VRAM GPUs available or soon to be released, like the MTT S80. Yeah it sucks as a Graphics card because the chip is behind, but you get 16Gb of GDDR6 for much cheaper than anything else.

But its not a conspiracy to fight China. The infinite scaling was just Nvidia solidifying themselves as the monopoly because they want all AI infrastructure to be dependent on them, which is why they still illegally export to China, despite an export ban attempting to reduce their potential competition.

Moore Threads (MTT) already has their own CUDA like system called MUSA, and I'm sure they'll be happy to put in proper hardware support for new stuff like Bf16 and FP8/4. It'll take a few years, but eventually China will catch up to the point where Nvidia gets shanked by cheaper hardware.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't there development of a linux translation layer for CUDA workloads to run on AMD GPUs? I haven't heard about it in a while, but I'd imagine that'd help the situation.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

You mean ZLUDA? AMD gave up on it and released the project on github.

Personally I dream for CUDA API implementation in open source GPU drivers on Linux. That would absolutely level the playing field for the whole industry

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

MTT is just a pipe dream, last I checked. But Deepseek is actively being served, in mixed FP8/FP4, on racks of Huawei accelerators.

I believe Baidu trained a model on them, too. But most training (like Deepseek’s) is still done on CUDA.


…Also, be careful equating this stuff with any kind of “consumer friendly” hardware you or I could buy. That’s less likely. The Huawei accelerators (and other local Chinese hardware experiments) are geared towards huge servers serving requests in parallel.

[–] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed. I am not longer paying token fees as I am running QWEN 3.6 27B MTP on my 4090 GPU and it is as good and as fast as the frontier models for agentic coding.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

What's the rest of your stack look like?

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 65 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Hyper scaling was always about cornering the computer market, It was never about providing us some vastly new and superior service.

They should be strung up. And middle management needs to return to fucking school.

It’s like Kyle Kulinski said “I’m starting to understand re-education camps now”

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 40 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Hyper scaling was always about cornering the computer market, It was never about providing us some vastly new and superior service.

Exactly, its a method of taking tens of billions of dollars in capital and buying a near monopoly. No other providers can compete if the hyperscalers buy all of the hardware, driving up the prices while also selling the service at a loss.

Nobody working out of their garage with a cool idea for a better service can compete if they can't get hardware and have to charge double what the hyperscalers are charging because they can't burn capital for years.

It's a practice that should be considered illegal market manipulation, because that's what it i

e: extraneous 'completely'

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 15 points 15 hours ago

'Dumping' is considered anti-competitive behaviour in a lot of places. This sounds a lot like that.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The state of things is what if, that's true. It has not happened. :)

At some point, it should happen. Still not going to put a dent in the datacenter / dystopia rally though, since they will pick Nvidia and known brands.