this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
575 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

84866 readers
5350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 60 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Hyper scaling was always about cornering the computer market, It was never about providing us some vastly new and superior service.

They should be strung up. And middle management needs to return to fucking school.

It’s like Kyle Kulinski said “I’m starting to understand re-education camps now”

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 36 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Hyper scaling was always about cornering the computer market, It was never about providing us some vastly new and superior service.

Exactly, its a method of taking tens of billions of dollars in capital and buying a near monopoly. No other providers can compete if the hyperscalers buy all of the hardware, driving up the prices while also selling the service at a loss.

Nobody working out of their garage with a cool idea for a better service can compete if they can't get hardware and have to charge double what the hyperscalers are charging because they can't burn capital for years.

It's a practice that should be considered illegal market manipulation, because that's what it i

e: extraneous 'completely'

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 13 points 15 hours ago

'Dumping' is considered anti-competitive behaviour in a lot of places. This sounds a lot like that.