this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
223 points (96.7% liked)

Europe

11226 readers
628 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Laser@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The Swedish way to become smoke-free is however closed to all other European countries as snus which is used as an alternative is illegal everywhere else. Also they just traded one way of nicotine administration against another, though I do think it's less harmful, but I'm not a medical professional.

So not as incredible as this headline makes it sound

[โ€“] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is less harmful for bystanders in the least but should totally be banned alongside smoking itself.

[โ€“] Bob@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why should it be banned? It is not harmful to bystanders, and a lot less harmful than smoking to individual users. Even passive smoking entails a higher risk of developing cancer than actively using snus.

[โ€“] slaacaa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a Snus vending machine within a Swedish grocery store, I took the picture last week. Good that they are smoke-free, but they are not at all nicotine-free

[โ€“] kungen@feddit.nu 1 points 20 hours ago

Good that they are smoke-free, but they are not at all nicotine-free

Yep, and what's wrong with that? If adults want to take a substance, especially one that has significantly fewer health risks than many other legal substances, who am I to stop them?

And what's the difference between tobacco-free snus and products that have been approved as "smoking cessation products" for so many years? Absolutely nothing, and you can buy them OTC, just usually a bit more expensive than nicotine pouches.

If countries truly cared about their citizens health, they'd be banning much more dangerous substances instead of nicotine pouches.

[โ€“] CAVOK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

There are nicotine pouches that's not currently banned in all EU counties which is the same thing for all practical purposes. I believe France banned them in February though.

However, there's a discussion on the effectiveness on those pouches as a means of quitting cigarettes , since the reduction in smoking by women (who traditionally don't use snus) seems to have happened before the nicotine pouches were introduced.

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Thank you and @humanius@lemmy.world for the context. It still is a great achievement to have less people smoking normal ciggies.