this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
510 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

84930 readers
4010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because LLMs and similar generative “AI” tools aren't intelligent.

Nor, arguably, are they artificial, since the models are grown rather than built.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

What is intelligence? Also, I think artificial refers to the fact that they don't have life.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Because signal matching and manipulation is not intelligence unless you're willing to admit that is all you are capable of.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

AI tools don't actively manipulate people. They're just confident about their answers as they should be.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

I think they meant signal matching and signal manipulation

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I meant signal manipulation, but sure, that includes manipulating humans since we are just another signal input. That isn't a statement on values, just an objective description of how it works.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I still don't understand how it cannot be as intelligent as us.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 4 hours ago

That "intelligence" will tell you how it is not as intelligent if you ask directly. This is not because it's intelligent and KNOWS it's limitations but because it picked up on my signal for what I wanted and gave something resembling that to me. You could ask it the opposite thing and arrive at a very different conclusion. https://claude.ai/share/97859aae-beb2-4245-a8b1-460122ee4aa1

I would even say the analogies it gave aren't entirely accurate. A person reading a book experiences it very differently than an LLM. And this is a key insight to an element of the Turing test where you ask it to explain some poetry (not simply write a poem).