this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

24 readers
1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@viewfinder.pro
1
Mirrorless isn’t all that (for stills) (alien.top)
submitted 11 months ago by Pyroweedical@alien.top to c/photography@viewfinder.pro
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hello peoples! I recently acquired a Sony A6400. Now I didn’t get it for stills, I got it mainly to start practicing video as I’m majoring in film.

Video I haven’t messed around with it all that much, but I’m pretty pleased with the results so far.

Stills tho…… I’m super disappointed. I think it has to do with that it has an EVF. I get EVFs have a lot of advantages, but those come at the expense of the user experience.

I was shooting some landscape just now, and the flip up screen is cool and all, but I COULDNT SEE MY SCENE. Like I had no idea what was actually in my shadows, and it was not conducive for taking good pictures.

Eye af and all the info is cool, but idk… I just don’t like EVFS for stills.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] incidencematrix@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I guess it's refreshing to have a workman-blames-tools post where they blame newer hardware instead of older hardware. Usually, I see some variant of "I'm not Ansel Adams because my camera is a year old and only cost $10k, tell me which new one to buy." This one has a more traditionalist aesthetic. (Obligatory fair shake comment: using an EVF effectively if you are used to SLRs does take a shift in thinking. I didn't realize how much I had internalized about the peculiarities of the SLR viewfinder until I started working with a mirrorless system and wasn't getting the results I expected. Not hard to adapt, though, once you realize the problem.)