this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
396 points (98.1% liked)

politics

29972 readers
2806 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] protist@retrofed.com 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes, though I'd really like to see some evidence besides this single image

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/texans-say-voting-machines-are-flipping-selections-to-the-other-party

The "user error" explanation given was complete bullshit. When you voted straight party, that was it. There was no way for the voter to accidentally switch the senatorial vote after that. You'd have to be very deliberate to pull that off. And it has nothing to do with "rendering".

https://www.texastribune.org/2018/10/26/texas-voting-machines-2018-straight-ticket-midterm-elections/

The Texas Tribune took the SoS's statement as gospel. But the SoS was the fox guarding the henhouse.

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen maybe two other images of the "Party = D, Senator = Cruz" ballot "error", but that's the only one I saved (also because I know who took it).

When I went back to see what had come from the "investigation", my heart just sank when I saw that the press had simply swallowed the line given to them by the Abbott-appointed Texas Secretary of State: "oops, no big deal".

[–] protist@retrofed.com 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Who did the person who took this send it too? Did they name the county responsible for their elections? If this is real, I'm having a hard time understanding how I would have never seen it as a Texan plugged into subversive communities

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Lady I know from Twitter posted it on there, and took it in Harris County.

And I don't know why you're so concerned about its veracity; the issue was widely reported on in Texas during the 2018 election. Search for that election and the phrase "vote flipping" and you should find out all you need to know-- well, at least all that Texas election officials were willing to admit to.

The same thing happened in Cruz's 2012 election-- same voting machine manufacturer, too-- although it was more widely reported on in 2018. They've cheated for him twice now.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I searched as instructed on duck duck go and there wasn't a single hit on this topic on the first 3 pages of search results. Do you have any links at all?

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I posted this yesterday, but here you go

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/texans-say-voting-machines-are-flipping-selections-to-the-other-party

The "user error" explanation given was complete bullshit. When you voted straight party, that was it. There was no way for the voter to accidentally switch the senatorial vote after that. You'd have to be very deliberate to pull that off. And it has nothing to do with "rendering".

https://www.texastribune.org/2018/10/26/texas-voting-machines-2018-straight-ticket-midterm-elections/

The Texas Tribune took the SoS's statement as gospel. But the SoS was the fox guarding the henhouse.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's very fair