this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
97 points (97.1% liked)
People Twitter
10041 readers
665 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Colombia President Gustavo Petro’s Polarized Remark Turns Gemini AI Op-Ed Into Election Firestorm
Colombian President Gustavo Petro replied “Heil Hitler” to an op-ed co-written with Google’s Gemini AI.
The June 7 column in El Espectador endorsed right-wing candidate Abelardo de la Espriella for president. Colombians choose their next leader in a runoff on June 21.
Petro’s “Heil Hitler” Reply to an AI Op-Ed Lights the Fuse
Columnist Felipe Zuleta Lleras stated he built the column from a single Gemini prompt and endorsed every word. The disclosure put Google’s Gemini chatbot at the center of a presidential campaign.
The piece argued Colombia needs order, authority, and economic freedom. Moreover, it praised De la Espriella’s 90-day security offensive and his pledge to cut the state apparatus by 40%.
The text styled the candidate as the surgeon Colombia needs after years of weak public order. However, it offered no disclosure beyond Zuleta’s short opening note.
Petro answered the newspaper’s post on X with the two-word Nazi salute
BeInCrypto could not verify the reply’s engagement figures beyond X’s own counters.
Their reaction echoes a wider fight over AI replacing journalists. It also revives an earlier Gemini controversy over a staged demo video.
Runoff Stakes Sharpen the Backlash
De la Espriella won the May 31 first round with 43.7% of the vote, according to official results. Iván Cepeda, Petro’s chosen successor, trailed with 40.9%, a 2.8-point gap.
Thirteen candidates ran in the first round, and none cleared the 50% bar. Therefore, the two-week runoff sprint now concentrates the country’s full political attention.
Critics branded the president’s reply antisemitic and reckless. Supporters, in contrast, read it as satire against the column’s authoritarian framing.
Petro also has a record of Nazi comparisons. Germany responded publicly to his earlier Hitler remarks. Chile likewise filed a protest after he called José Antonio Kast a “son of Hitler.”
Term limits bar Petro from the ballot, yet his words still shape the race. Each provocation now doubles as a campaign event for both runoff camps.
The coming two weeks will show whether the episode moves votes or fades.
Meanwhile, the affair hands AI publishing a high-profile stress test, as AI reshapes publisher traffic and newsroom standards worldwide.
I'm so confused
I think he's saying that the call for "order, authority and economic freedom" is something out of the Nazi playbook, which it is. But if that's the case, he really should have used at least a few more words to do so.
How so?