this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
817 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87017 readers
4559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

x86 at 25MHz could barely run it. This is ARM at 24.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also 3KB of RAM. That has to be too little.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I think I had 2-4MB, but it was a long time ago, so I could be mistaken.

It also had an FPU addon, which I don't think the M0 has.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When I was a kid we had a 386-33MHz with 4MB RAM, it ran Doom at about 1-2FPS. Upgraded to a 486 DX (66MHz I think?) and 8MB RAM and it ran great on that. It's possible that the 386 would have been fine if we put more RAM in though, I think the biggest issue was swapping.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Set it to low quality and hit Ctrl+Minus until the window is the size of a postage stamp and it's buttery smooth.

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People got it running on a pregnancy test once, so...

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To clarify, it wasn't running on the pregnancy test, it was just outputting to one.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the screen had been replaced… so it was truly pointless.

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Lmao, I didn't know that part. Yeah, at that point who fucking cares. 😂

[–] ErrorCode@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Came here looking for this question