this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
527 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

85226 readers
5578 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Next up, turning these into AI web scraper bots!

/pleasedon’tdothis

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 49 minutes ago

Ok here's my billion dollar idea: vapes that already are web servers!

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

But does it run DOOM?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 11 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

You can run Doom on a literal potato

[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago
[–] onnekas@sopuli.xyz 49 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Reusing them, even in small experimental projects, underscores a broader sustainability opportunity.

Bigger opportunity would be banning this shit.

[–] queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

outright bans just allow black markets to flourish. harm reduction and public safety campaigns would go much further

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 35 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

We wouldn't be banning vaping, we'd be banning disposable vapes.

[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 24 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who vapes quite a bit, I would genuinely love to see this. Disposables are an absolute shitshow and never should have existed in the first place.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously. I struggle to fathom how running out for disposables is even slightly more convenient than refilling a proper tank every so often and replacing the coil. It tastes better, lasts longer and makes much less waste.

[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

I think it's the marketing of it. A decent amount of people I've talked to genuinely don't know that there's a reusable option. This also changed when the tobacco industry got involved. Vaping used to have more of a culture of cessation. It was talked about how you could transition from cigs at a higher nicotine level, then bring it down until you're vaping zero nic, then quit that. I barely hear anyone talk about the quitting pipeline anymore. I don't think it's an accident, I think it's intentional.

Edit: I also think it's the fact that you only have to buy one thing, and the 3 things (device, coils, juice) aren't available in every gas station like disposables are. And the user experience - open the box and it starts right up, no refills, all it needs is a charge once in a while. People are really fucking lazy, by nature. But the cost of all those conveniences is indebted tenfold upon the environment, as destruction and waste.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This, cartridges make me feel dirty, let alone wasting a entire li-ion cell too.

[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

There are some shops that will actually collect the vapes and send them back to the manufacturer for recycling. But it's less common than it used to be, which frustrates me to no end, it should be the reverse if anything.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 101 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

"it was actually a PY32F002B, powered by a 24 MHz Arm Cortex M0+ processor. The chip also carried 24KB of flash storage and 3KB of static RAM"

To process a single button.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Well the PY32F002B (costing a few cents) even though it has a 32-bit (entry level) ARM core @ 24MHz is literally cheaper than older and less powerful microcontrollers.

Granted, if you don't do anything else than react to a push button it's still cheaper to use discrete electronic components than a microcontroller, but given that this device has a LiPo battery (meaning there's battery control involved) and judging by the picture a USB-C connector, there's probably a bit more digital logic in it, by which point a 3 cent microcontroller plus a cheap SMD crystal and some caps is cheaper than using discrete components.

The domain of embedded systems has evolved to the point that it's the best option for almost everything in consumer electronics, mainly because at the lower end there are so many stupidly cheap and easy to use choices were you don't run an OS in it but instead just a single block of single-threaded code directly on the bare metal accessing registers directly.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Temperature control, likely something to keep track of how much is left in the device, and I’m betting I’m forgetting something.

I doubt discreet electronics can cut it at that point.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, as per the analysis I did in another post, even a 555 and a couple of transistors to just blink an LED is more expensive than putting a microcontroller like this one there.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 13 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's so you can have a spinny animation when you hit the button.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

that's more powerful than my first computer

can it play Grover Teaches Typing?

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (15 children)

Because an existing SoC at scale is cheaper than a custom ASIC.

You see this all the time, custom keyboard running ARM+Linux, SmartNICs using RISC-V cores/FPGAs instead of ASIC accelerators. Even Microsoft refuses to commit to ASICs for network processing in their DCs and use FPGAs instead.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (9 children)

What can I do with my samsung smartphone whose screen is broken?

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

Hardware isn't the limitation, its willingness to fight locked down hardware and the power management of android. You might be able use ADB to control it, install termux and then with that, SSH server and then a server of some sort.

In my experience, most phones don't seem to boot sans battery, so its just a matter of time until the battery goes poof and your system goes down. Some manage it though - you do get a decent amount of hardware for the power consumption.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›