this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NFL
77 readers
1 users here now
A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cuz lack of weapons is why the jets suck right? I swear they're TRYING to lose if they do this without addressing the o line first.
In fairness their oline has been ravaged by injuries….they haven’t had the same oline play back to back games since week 4….the only starters out there are Becton and Tomlinson and in some cases they have been down to 3rd string or PS players
Easier to ignore facts when it’s about the Jets
Since week 4? Was the online not allowing tons of pressure before this?
Yeah I’ve seen the article…I guess I’m relying on the eye test after watching every game…I think the context of this being Rodgers offense and not using a lot motion so he can make his own presnap adjustment has something to do w those numbers…also I can say w 100% certainty that losing AVT in back to back years has been a crusher for the Oline and his presence greatly influences the overall result more than any other player on that line
Their receivers after Wilson are incredibly unimpressive.
…that said, Allen Lazard will now cook the Bills for 140 and 2 TDs.
True, but that's partly because they decided to bring in Allen Lazard and the corpse of Randall Cobb to appease Rodgers rather than actually try and get adequate backups.
I think they should bolster the on-line and find a complimentary #2 to Garrett Wilson than overpay for a 32 year old Davante.
Cobb was supposed to be the #5 WR, but Davis randomly retired and Hardman was terrible.
I don’t remember the last game we scored a TD lol. 2 would be like a 1000% increase.