this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

77 readers
1 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gyman122@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly this makes sense. The calls to go to Heinicke were a classic example of the backup QB always being the most popular guy in town, he was really equally awful. Ridder’s not gonna make your chances of winning any worse, he’s had the best game a Falcons QB had this season by far, he’s a better runner, and you might as well see what you have in him before next season

[–] lronicGasping@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he was equally awful

No the fuck he was not lmao this isn't true regardless of whether you're box score watching or actually watching the games.

[–] Falcon84@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Idk man I watched the games and even if Heinicke was slightly better he wasn't moving the needle enough to justify playing him over someone that is much younger and can still develop.

[–] Thecobs@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Offensive points per game under ridder: 16

Offensive points per game under heineke: 24

Ridder turnovers: 8 in 7 games

Heineke turnovers: 1 in 3 games

Just because the Falcons lost didnt mean it was because of him.

[–] it678@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Heinecke wasn’t the reason we scored those points though. 7 of them were actually when ridder came in

[–] FantasyTrash@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Offensive points per game under Ridder: 16

Offensive points per game under Heinicke: 24

Ridder turnovers: 12 in nine games

Heineke turnovers: 1 in three games

How is Ridder the better option?