this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
46 points (100.0% liked)
Animals and Pets
5413 readers
2 users here now
Pretty self explanatory. Post animals, post pets, post stuff about animals and pets!
(It's not mandatory, but we also encourage providing a description of your image(s) for accessibility purposes! See here for a more detailed explanation and advice on how best to do this.)
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A Red Eft might be more applicable. It may become an Eastern Newt if it's smart and makes good efting decisions. Amphibians are considered a different creature through its development cycle. The three main stages of an Eastern Newt are:
1-Larval stage is aquatic based. (Tadpole)
2-Red Eft stage is terrestrial based (This beautiful creature)
3-Eastern Newt stage is aquatic based (Same geometry but more drab greens and browns)
You usually only see the Eft because of the glaring red. The other stages are mostly aquatic and well camoflaged.
Amphibians, butterflies... Creatures that metamorph are particularly neat to me.
People who know these kinds of things are particularly neat to me (like you!) I know they have a long life cycle if they make good decisions but didn't realize they were considered different creatures based on their developmental stage
In the Newts case, it is because of the metamorphosis. That process changes the larvaes gills to juvenile lungs, and then the second metamorphosis replaces the juveniles lungs with adult gills again. This forces the change of habitat, since you gotta match the stomping grounds with the plumbing and also a change of food. It truly is a different lifeform with a different skillset, different needs and different goals at each stage.
A lifeform figuring out to drastically reform its own body twice over its campaign just doesn't seem to be an idea that would spawn from nature, to me anyway. It's one of the best argument for intelligent design in my opinion. Truly remarkable.
I land more on the "ten iterations on every iteration that works" model of evolutionary pressures and the arms/gills race that ensues but I think this is appropriate regardless