this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
24 points (87.5% liked)

Ask Science

16832 readers
248 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also since a Black Hole sucks 90% of it's surroundings into it, what about time distillation? Does time cease to exist inside a black hole or does black hole pull time apart too?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In short, time travel means nothing without space travel. Earth is rotating around the Sun (Sol star), Sol rotates around the galaxy and the galaxy is also moving. So say you want to prevent the assassination of JFK, you’re not just talking about going back 66-67 years, but say you don’t even care where on Earth you end up, where was Earth then? What’s your point of reference? Your point of reference moved.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Not just travel, but faster-than-light travel. Either one implies the other.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And there's absolutely nothing to suggest if you time travel, you will be a fixed point in space.

There's nothing to suggest that won't be the case, but until we know more about the universe, this argument will never hold water for me.

Of course since it's all theoretical and will never be relevant in our lifetimes, it holds as much water as any other argument...

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

Well, if you assume that going back in time means you also go back along the position of the earth, then sure. But to simply go back in time doesn’t imply that. You’re right in that it’s all fantasy, I’m just saying it’s two different movements, and us understanding one (movement in space, like walking) and not the other (time) tells me they aren’t necessarily connected.

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't space travel based on speed?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time travel isn't based on anything, since it's currently theoretically impossible.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

It's practically impossible. Theoretically there doesn't seem to be anything stopping one from changing their flow of time. Physics technically allows for time travel. Reality and practical application don't.