this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
84 points (97.7% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

7138 readers
550 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/c/chevron7/p/987676/they-wrote-the-same-episode-twice

Both episodes feature a female officer being abducted and later participating in a fight to the death, which both parties survive. In further coincidence, both episodes are the fourth episodes of their shows' first season.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ill-fuckin-do-it-again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but she also wrote some good episodes. It's strange.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not that strange. Writers are often up against tight deadlines and you just gotta do what you gotta do. Not every thing you produce is going to be your best work.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Not an excuse for blatant racism.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I don't think anybody was trying to make excuses for racism or anything else, the discussion was about reusing plots and this other person correctly pointed out that writers commonly do it. I mean I understand everybody has their hot issues they bring up at every opportunity - one of mine is the Epstein files, but you don't see me irrelevantly mentioning the Epstein files.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

That user was saying that having a short schedule does not excuse all the problems that make it not a good episode. That first commenter had mentioned "good episodes", and the reply mentioned that the reason that this episode is not "good" is because of the short schedules or whatever. But there is a small list of reasons why these episodes are often considered not good:

  • racism
  • sexism
  • reused plot
  • etc.

Having a short schedule only excuses one of these points. The other points which make it not a good episode have nothing to do with the schedule. That is what the "not an excuse for racism" reply was directed towards. They understand that a short schedule explains why the plot was reused, but it does not actually explain why the episode was simply not good.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Brought it up because these episodes are bad above and beyond because of racism its not irrelevant at all?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was trying to keep it light. This is a thread about reusing plotlines. I mean if you see a black guy and a white guy walking down the street there's really no need to start a rant about the history of slavery. I'm out.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

A thread about this particular example which involved racist writing watch code of honor and tell me again racism is irrelevant in this conversation what are you even talking about?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago

She wrote lizards, not africans

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What the fuck, man? Nobody said anything about "blatant racism", and you downvote me, too? I am not familiar with either of these episodes just by their name. I'm simply responding to the idea that the same person can write good things and terrible things for TV.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

okay yes in general but these episodes are extremely racist nonsense so your defense isn't accurate in this case at all.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe don't weigh in on things you don't understand then?

If you don't know what the episodes are and why they are problematic, I'm not sure why you'd wasn't to try and defend the episode writing...

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

The topic is specifically about a writer reusing the same script for two different TV series. Not about racism. I'm not sure who invited the censors who want to stop people from talking about one thing just because it's related to something else.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No, but it is an explanation. Racism is ultimately just a particularly harmful kind of lazy thinking, reducing complex people to lazy stereotypes. But just because it can have a mundane origin doesn't mean it's not evil.