this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
304 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

85583 readers
4128 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reliance on artificial-intelligence tools degrades the abilities of physicians and software engineers, studies show.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (5 children)

I think in five years — if the tools manage to stick around — finding coders that can work without AI assistance will be like finding skilled assembler developers.

EDIT: Yep I'm definitely a bot because I typed an em dash. You can be a bot too on Ubuntu by hitting control+shift+u and then typing 2014 (the last year of semi-sanity in US politics).

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sweet. I'm set for life, and I'll get to be one of those devs that tells the bosses what I've decided to work on.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

Can I join your dream?

As a senior c/c++ expert I hope it comes true but somehow I doubt it 😔.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 2 points 18 hours ago

Or a life of fixing AI slop the AI sloppers generate but can't fix.

[–] teft@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

And how much you’ve decided to work for.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -5 points 11 hours ago

Find the bot with the mdash

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The next question is, who is going to be looking for them?

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Most of Africa, from what I heard from African developers.

There are still large patches where the internet has outages often, data centers there too suffer from it. Same with energy, depending on the region it is not a guarantee.

(This is of course a consequence of Africa still transforming and putting up infrastructure, and it varies vastly depending on the region).

It's hard to code with remote LLMs if they can go dark for half a day, and it is pricey to have it running on a local stack (at good token output speed).

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 1 points 7 hours ago

Excellent answer.

[–] formation@sh.itjust.works -3 points 12 hours ago

Said the AI comment.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Isn't the entire point of computers to achieve a result faster than we could without them?

Your argument seems like bemoaning the invention of the paint roller because people won't learn how to use brushes or their hands to paint walls.

Work output isn't inherently more valuable just because the job was harder to do, or took more effort.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Eh, not really, and it isn't really an argument but more of a lighthearted prediction.

I think the big question is whether or not the "frontier" models continue to be available and evolve, because the business model for running them seems very unsound.

I kinda hope the AI bubble busts, and that afterwards some of the efforts turn toward making open source models more performant and powerful.

[–] L7HM77@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

To stay with the paint analogy, AI is more like a paint roller that can paint by itself.

Just tell it what color you want the room to be, and walk away. Did it remove the original coat properly? Sand, prime, and double recoat? No idea, it looks good at the moment. But we'll find out in a couple years when the cracks and bubbles start showing.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

...which would be a useful continuation of the analogy if not for the fact that 95% of human house painters rush through jobs, cut costs on materials, and overcharge.

Just like every other new technology before it, those who oppose love to compare the lowest quality output of the new technology to the output of the Top 5% of human craftspeople.

For anything AI can do, there are MILLIONS of lazy humans taking 100 times longer pumping out the same or worse quality work at 10 times the cost.