The amount of people blindly trusting a black box word predictor with actual life decisions is terrifying. I'm legit cutting people out of my life due to this shit rofl
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Respect. Many opportunities these days for people to show us who they really are.
Also, excellent username.
Respect. Many opportunities these days for people to show us who they really are.
Unfortunately so. Truly I just want the best for those around me but you can only spend so much time trying to help before it becomes detrimental to oneself.
Also, excellent username.
Thanks :)
Twenty-five years ago I drove taxi for a few years and during training they were very clear that relying on gps prohibits you from learning. Taxi people knew that.
For the last fifteen years I've been a software engineer and in this field, the ability to pick up and maintain knowledge are cornerstones of the job. Having someone do your tasks for you will degrade your abilities to get said tasks done. CS people knows that.
Management however thinks that we will not need those skills in the future.
Because a good chunk of c-suite management jobs are mostly a bullshit job designed to give trust fund kids some sort of career. Their jobs are the most easily replaced by automation since most of what they do is bitching at people via emails.
As someone who's been on both sides we're all just trying to do what's best for keeping people paid. Unless you work in a PE company and you're constantly sucking the boards cocks so you dont get fired.
Do you believe the majority of taxi drivers don't use GPS?
From the future:
AI was the stealthy nail in the coffin. We’d already experienced a century of loss of knowledge. Basic things like animal husbandry, growing crops, mining, smelting, forging…programming. all the things that used to be done by brute human strength or knowledge were now done by computers and AI. But profit was king, out with the old knowledge, in with the new lack of it.
So when the calamity finally happened, nobody was left with any of the knowledge to rebuild.
Breaking News: making robots do stuff for you destroys your ability to do stuff.
i mean look at reddit andf dev subreddit. since ai NONE of them look capable to code anything.
I think in five years — if the tools manage to stick around — finding coders that can work without AI assistance will be like finding skilled assembler developers.
EDIT: Yep I'm definitely a bot because I typed an em dash. You can be a bot too on Ubuntu by hitting control+shift+u and then typing 2014 (the last year of semi-sanity in US politics).
Find the bot with the mdash
Said the AI comment.
Sweet. I'm set for life, and I'll get to be one of those devs that tells the bosses what I've decided to work on.
Can I join your dream?
As a senior c/c++ expert I hope it comes true but somehow I doubt it 😔.
Or a life of fixing AI slop the AI sloppers generate but can't fix.
And how much you’ve decided to work for.
The next question is, who is going to be looking for them?
Most of Africa, from what I heard from African developers.
There are still large patches where the internet has outages often, data centers there too suffer from it. Same with energy, depending on the region it is not a guarantee.
(This is of course a consequence of Africa still transforming and putting up infrastructure, and it varies vastly depending on the region).
It's hard to code with remote LLMs if they can go dark for half a day, and it is pricey to have it running on a local stack (at good token output speed).
Excellent answer.
Isn't the entire point of computers to achieve a result faster than we could without them?
Your argument seems like bemoaning the invention of the paint roller because people won't learn how to use brushes or their hands to paint walls.
Work output isn't inherently more valuable just because the job was harder to do, or took more effort.
Eh, not really, and it isn't really an argument but more of a lighthearted prediction.
I think the big question is whether or not the "frontier" models continue to be available and evolve, because the business model for running them seems very unsound.
I kinda hope the AI bubble busts, and that afterwards some of the efforts turn toward making open source models more performant and powerful.
To stay with the paint analogy, AI is more like a paint roller that can paint by itself.
Just tell it what color you want the room to be, and walk away. Did it remove the original coat properly? Sand, prime, and double recoat? No idea, it looks good at the moment. But we'll find out in a couple years when the cracks and bubbles start showing.
...which would be a useful continuation of the analogy if not for the fact that 95% of human house painters rush through jobs, cut costs on materials, and overcharge.
Just like every other new technology before it, those who oppose love to compare the lowest quality output of the new technology to the output of the Top 5% of human craftspeople.
For anything AI can do, there are MILLIONS of lazy humans taking 100 times longer pumping out the same or worse quality work at 10 times the cost.
Hell, even before AI there were signs. Half the mechanics in our shop can't diagnose shit unless there's an error code shown when they plug in the computer.
I googled the error code and it says you might have "network connectivity issues"
I can't figure out what's wrong. Every time I print a document, it says it prints, but I just get out a piece of white paper. It was getting lighter and lighter and lighter, and now it's just gone entirely.
Lol
It's a good thing AI doesn't rely on competent people for training its input and double-checking its output, because otherwise this would be very bad news.
"our"? Screw you too.
Wait, really? Oh damn. Maybe we should.... Naaaaaah.