this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
295 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

85583 readers
4066 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reliance on artificial-intelligence tools degrades the abilities of physicians and software engineers, studies show.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The amount of people blindly trusting a black box word predictor with actual life decisions is terrifying. I'm legit cutting people out of my life due to this shit rofl

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Respect. Many opportunities these days for people to show us who they really are.

Also, excellent username.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 hour ago

Respect. Many opportunities these days for people to show us who they really are.

Unfortunately so. Truly I just want the best for those around me but you can only spend so much time trying to help before it becomes detrimental to oneself.

Also, excellent username.

Thanks :)

[–] MirrorGiraffe@piefed.social 24 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Twenty-five years ago I drove taxi for a few years and during training they were very clear that relying on gps prohibits you from learning. Taxi people knew that.

For the last fifteen years I've been a software engineer and in this field, the ability to pick up and maintain knowledge are cornerstones of the job. Having someone do your tasks for you will degrade your abilities to get said tasks done. CS people knows that.

Management however thinks that we will not need those skills in the future.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Because a good chunk of c-suite management jobs are mostly a bullshit job designed to give trust fund kids some sort of career. Their jobs are the most easily replaced by automation since most of what they do is bitching at people via emails.

[–] formation@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

As someone who's been on both sides we're all just trying to do what's best for keeping people paid. Unless you work in a PE company and you're constantly sucking the boards cocks so you dont get fired.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago

Do you believe the majority of taxi drivers don't use GPS?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

From the future:

AI was the stealthy nail in the coffin. We’d already experienced a century of loss of knowledge. Basic things like animal husbandry, growing crops, mining, smelting, forging…programming. all the things that used to be done by brute human strength or knowledge were now done by computers and AI. But profit was king, out with the old knowledge, in with the new lack of it.

So when the calamity finally happened, nobody was left with any of the knowledge to rebuild.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Breaking News: making robots do stuff for you destroys your ability to do stuff.

[–] LightDelaBlue@jlai.lu 6 points 19 hours ago

i mean look at reddit andf dev subreddit. since ai NONE of them look capable to code anything.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (5 children)

I think in five years — if the tools manage to stick around — finding coders that can work without AI assistance will be like finding skilled assembler developers.

EDIT: Yep I'm definitely a bot because I typed an em dash. You can be a bot too on Ubuntu by hitting control+shift+u and then typing 2014 (the last year of semi-sanity in US politics).

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -4 points 10 hours ago

Find the bot with the mdash

[–] formation@sh.itjust.works -2 points 10 hours ago

Said the AI comment.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sweet. I'm set for life, and I'll get to be one of those devs that tells the bosses what I've decided to work on.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

Can I join your dream?

As a senior c/c++ expert I hope it comes true but somehow I doubt it 😔.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago

Or a life of fixing AI slop the AI sloppers generate but can't fix.

[–] teft@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

And how much you’ve decided to work for.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The next question is, who is going to be looking for them?

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Most of Africa, from what I heard from African developers.

There are still large patches where the internet has outages often, data centers there too suffer from it. Same with energy, depending on the region it is not a guarantee.

(This is of course a consequence of Africa still transforming and putting up infrastructure, and it varies vastly depending on the region).

It's hard to code with remote LLMs if they can go dark for half a day, and it is pricey to have it running on a local stack (at good token output speed).

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 hours ago

Excellent answer.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Isn't the entire point of computers to achieve a result faster than we could without them?

Your argument seems like bemoaning the invention of the paint roller because people won't learn how to use brushes or their hands to paint walls.

Work output isn't inherently more valuable just because the job was harder to do, or took more effort.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Eh, not really, and it isn't really an argument but more of a lighthearted prediction.

I think the big question is whether or not the "frontier" models continue to be available and evolve, because the business model for running them seems very unsound.

I kinda hope the AI bubble busts, and that afterwards some of the efforts turn toward making open source models more performant and powerful.

[–] L7HM77@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

To stay with the paint analogy, AI is more like a paint roller that can paint by itself.

Just tell it what color you want the room to be, and walk away. Did it remove the original coat properly? Sand, prime, and double recoat? No idea, it looks good at the moment. But we'll find out in a couple years when the cracks and bubbles start showing.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

...which would be a useful continuation of the analogy if not for the fact that 95% of human house painters rush through jobs, cut costs on materials, and overcharge.

Just like every other new technology before it, those who oppose love to compare the lowest quality output of the new technology to the output of the Top 5% of human craftspeople.

For anything AI can do, there are MILLIONS of lazy humans taking 100 times longer pumping out the same or worse quality work at 10 times the cost.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Hell, even before AI there were signs. Half the mechanics in our shop can't diagnose shit unless there's an error code shown when they plug in the computer.

[–] Million@lemmy.zip 7 points 17 hours ago

I googled the error code and it says you might have "network connectivity issues"

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can't figure out what's wrong. Every time I print a document, it says it prints, but I just get out a piece of white paper. It was getting lighter and lighter and lighter, and now it's just gone entirely.

Lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a good thing AI doesn't rely on competent people for training its input and double-checking its output, because otherwise this would be very bad news.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

"our"? Screw you too.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Wait, really? Oh damn. Maybe we should.... Naaaaaah.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The intro of Idiocracy on overdrive. Well done.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›