this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
345 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

87402 readers
3962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] BennyInc@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sure, but now you can blame the AI. Sorry, not our fault.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

how does the logic work so it's not their fault? if they are price fixing they are price fixing, the mechanism doesn't matter.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, if you tell an AI to do something, you are at least partially to blame for whatever it does. They shouldn't be able to avoid responsibility that easily.

That's kind if what Germany told Google. "If you have AI write your search summaries, you are responsible for checking its work and liable for its mistakes.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, you are entirely to blame.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

SHOULD be entirely to blame. But arnt cause rich people

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah you're probably on the money there. AI gives you some sort of plausible deniability?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It didn't work for the RealPage rent price-fixing lawsuit.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It kind of did. They got a slap on the wrist and will still do it. It's the 4th or 5th time they got busted for doing it.

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago

It certainly is. They get caught once in a while. The first time it happened was when I added the term "oligopoly" to my vocabulary.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Tell that to OPEC.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it illegal if they don't collude?

The but that makes using AI illegal is if they all use a common platform/service.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's legal if they don't do any communication between the companies. Then nobody can prove that there is collusion. Using AI, that all use the same way to raise the prices and vibe the prices higher as response to the other AI raising prices is even better. Then it's not even any human intent.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Landlords used a common platform to price fix without communication between the companies and that was ruled illegal, it's not quite the same but because of the way public LLMs don't isolate inputs from users, you could argue that if any 2 users input their prices into the same platform they are engaging in collision as the information isn't public.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-reaches-proposed-settlement-greystar-largest-us-landlord-end-its

Really we should just ban all algorithmic price setting.