this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
323 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

85708 readers
5342 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/electricvehicles/p/2162853/usa-slate-s-new-electric-truck-will-cost-slightly-more-than-24950

Range is said to be 205 mi (330 km), higher than the original estimate. This price is for the basic truck. The SUV configuration is expected to be $5000 more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ford's $30,000 EV truck is supposed to be here fairly soon as well, although it looks like that will only be available as a crew cab, sadly.

[–] ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unlike Slate, Ford has access to their vast trove of sales information over the past 8 decades from their truck division. I am pretty sure they figured out that a truck at a 30k price point needs to be a crew cab or larger to sell in the volume they need to make it work for them financially.

Unlike Slate, Ford is a business that needs to be profitable in what they do. They can't start-up style burn through a bunch of investor money to see if a market exists for bare-bones single cab trucks.

As a result I think both may well have a place in the market, and I am excited to see affordability overall coming back into the picture.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

As I recall, you can get the OG cab on food trucks, but it’s something that they primarily sell to fleets vehicles. Consumers usually want the extra cab storage.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't touch a Ford with someone else's money

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

The company who invented plastic oil pans.

[–] Canajan@piefed.ca 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Ford screwed up royally, the Lighting was way to overpriced, over complicated, and soiled the market. Ford’s dealers are also heavily to blame, asking well above msrp prices due to initial interest.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

The Lightning was Ford trying to make the massive profit margins Tesla was making.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Lightning was also supposed to retail at $30k IIRC.

[–] Devadander@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But it will be a real vehicle made by a real company with things like a ‘radio’

I put a deposit down on one when they were first announced. But that was when its price was competitive with cheap used EVs. Then accepting the stripped down bare bones truck made sense. This is too close to new EV pricing. Bolt, Leaf, Ford EV are all within range of this, especially with an option or two to make it livable. Plus at $25k you’re now competing with very clean used examples of the Hyundai triplets and mustang Mach e.

Best of luck, Slate, but to me the truck doesn’t justify its price.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

But it will be a real vehicle made by a real company with things like a ‘radio’

That's a bad thing, because "radio" these days implies "spying and enshittification."

Slate is the only EV on the entire market that isn't fucked with that deal-breaker.

[–] Devadander@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

CarPlay isn’t enshittification

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

CarPlay itself, perhaps not. The telemetry, ads, annoying safety nagging, and sometimes even paywalled vehicle features that tend to be implemented alongside it (because the underlying computerization facilitates both the good and the bad) is, though.

[–] Canajan@piefed.ca 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

None of your comparators are a truck though, if just looking for an EV I agree with you.

A truck is not needed by a lot of people, but when you need one, you need one.

[–] Devadander@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

The upcoming ford ev truck is absolutely a truck, and a Ford truck, not some plastic startup

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 1 points 20 hours ago

Im planning on waiting 5 years to see if it will become a thing and be well supported. Ive been burned by experimental tech before. But I hope to see more of these kind of projects pop up in the future.