this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
323 points (96.5% liked)
Technology
85708 readers
5342 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Americans get anxiety from having to do math in their heads. Average commute distance is 30 miles a day, and there is always some asshole who whines about towing his boat.
But don't try rational arguments with pickup drivers who commute to office jobs and drive a tank for that one time they needed to move a brother in law's couch.
Miles are a bad way to track performance because real life conditions can wildly impact BEV efficiency. I can tell you from first hand experience that towing, elevation changes, or moving at highway speeds in winter can cut per kWh efficiency in half.
And beyond that, you're supposed to be capping your daily charge limit below 100% for battery longevity. 200 theoretical miles can turn to 160 miles and down to 70 real quick. That can get uncomfortably tight if you miss an overnight charge.
Frankly, its dumb to criticize people who expect their personal vehicle to perform reasonably well in situations where a personal vehicle should excel. Why own a car if it can't do a round-trip weekend excursion or haul a bit of furniture?
By your logic everyone should only need a tiny moped with a rain jacket and a backpack. It's irrational to worry about climate control or passengers or suitcases, you statistically never need them.
You know what? You've led me to the diagnosis of my own EV range anxiety: Unpredictable performance.
In a gas powered car, you pretty much can think in miles. They put the "24 city, 29 highway" numbers on the sticker in the window, and that's pretty close to what you'll get out of it. Maybe loading it until it squats on the suspension or pulling a trailer or driving like a maniac will decrease the economy. But, if you do those kinds of things, you can fill the tank, note the mileage, drive like that awhile, fill the tank again, note the fuel consumed and the mileage performed and you've got a figure you can pretty much rely on no matter the weather. The limiting factor is almost always the driver. Drive 200-300 miles, stop for 5 minutes to fill the tank, drive 200-300 miles, stop for 5 minutes to fill the tank...
I happen to be a flight instructor. There's a whole chapter in flight school about cross country flight planning and predicting aircraft performance. Wind is such a factor that you really can't rate a plane in miles of range, but in hours of endurance. So to plan a flight, you look up the route of flight on an aeronautical chart, the weather forecast, read performance charts and tables out of the plane's Pilot's Operating Handbook, crunch a whole bunch of numbers and you'll know fairly precisely how long you'll be aloft and how much fuel you'll burn.
With an EV...they spit out a range in miles that the vehicle will do in unspecified ideal conditions, tell you that heat, cold, using the heater, using the air conditioner, carrying weight, wind and age will reduce the range, and then they'll get impatient with you if you try to work out what the vehicle will actually do and they'll mail you anthrax if the answer you arrive at is "not enough."
The plane trip is a great analogy. There's probably plenty of data on which aircraft can fly it and, optimizations aside, you might have the option of over-fueling to be sure you can accomplish it.
With a BEV your pitiful energy limit might mean doing all those cross country calculations just to reach the other side of the state. And even then the sheer number of variables (Will I hit traffic? Will a fast charger spot be available at X? When exactly will it drop below freezing? Will my battery be conditioned at start? Does M miles of ~N mi/kWh surface streets beat M-Y miles of highway...) makes it impossible to precisely say.
You basically have to drive by feel, hence my reckoning of my car needing 1.5-2x dashboard mileage buffer for critical margin trips. I've personally made the exact same trip in different conditions and pulled in from as low as 3% up to 35% battery remaining.
The only solutions are way better/larger batteries, much smaller cars, or massively expanded charging infrastructure. Unfortunately nothing [affordable] in the market is addressing any of those.
I think the market is addressing all three. The F-150 Lightning is giving way to the Slate and Ford's upcoming Ranchero. They're working on battery chemistries, they've been getting better. Charging infrastructure HAS been built out.
Gas car owners haven't seen EV charging stations going in, because they're often put in out-of-the-way places. They're not as visually obvious as gas stations, so gas car owners may have been surrounded by them and not realize it. So they don't feel like the infrastructure is there, when it is. The EV charging industry has done a better job of concealing itself from the American public than the NSA.
I could rant about charging stations being difficult to find, "But use an app" you mean nazi stalker software? We're in an age where a lot of people want to step back from all that shit because of who's running it all. I genuinely do prefer to find gas stations by seeing their signs. I could throw my phone in a lake and drive my 2005 Buick to California, right now. I know how the US interstate system works and I know how to find and buy gas without any precise location enabled spyware.
Let's ignore that for now, and instead: EV prononents like to point out that most charging will be done at home, and charging away from home will be a rare occasion mostly on road trips. Lemme ask you something: You got an app on your phone you only use occasionally? It's a pain in the ass, right? Go to order your quarterly pizza from Domino's and the app needs to be manually updated and logged back into and their terms of service have changed...sounds like fun to deal with when you've been sent on a 4 hour mission and you need to find a charging station. Phone apps aren't tools you can get and put in your toolbox until you need them, they rust.
BUT ANYWAY. What they need is better communication of the vehicle's limitations. The manufacturer spits out a number achieved in ideal conditions. Then you talk to owners and they go "Yeah. WELLLL...it depends" and start listing the conditions where you won't get that. Start telling me what the machine WILL do, give me ways to predict the vehicle's performance in non-ideal conditions, or start engineering those limits out.
I'd rather hear "It will do 200 miles between charges." more than "It'll do 300 miles. WELLLL...it depends. Maybe it'll only do 180 if it's cold out and you're running the heater."
The overall point I’m getting here is that yes, that’s a fine expectation to have. But do you really need a King Ranch Super Duty just to go to the airport twice a year?
Sure they do, but then complain about aFFoRdAbIlIty when a tank is $250.
Thats the trouble with private vehicles in a nutshell. Sit idle for 95% of the time, and we need to buy models that are capable for the 1% of the drives we might want to do in a year.
That's a false dichotomy.
I've been driving an S10 for decades. Yeah, it's a little bit 20th century, it makes 18mpg out of a large, slow, primitive V6. It's great for small truck missions, it's reasonable for long hauls, and I can expect to go THIS far on THIS much gas.
Not far on a lot of gas.