Photography

1 readers

1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@viewfinder.pro

Shallowest depth of field for full-car photo (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by ibeinspire@alien.top to c/photography@viewfinder.pro

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been trying to work this out but I can't quite.

85mm f1.4 looks great

70-200 f2.8 @200mm looks great too (better?)

If you crop 85mm to 200mm you would get 200mm f3.3 equiv. So the 70-200 is actually better.

Ok so 105mm f1.4 exists... That's 200mm f2.66 equiv. 135mm f1.8 is the exact same equiv. But you have to crop (not ideal).

Is there anything better still?

Does subject distance matter? Maybe with a 50mm f1.2 but with you physically closer depth of field would be more shallow? Probably not.

I don't care about having the whole car in focus, I just want critical focus on one part and a super dramatic look.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheRealGabbro@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Depth of field is a factor of the aperture selected, and nothing else. But to make the subject appear the same size when using crop factor lenses the subject needs to be further away from the camera. DOF increases with subject to camera distance (focal length) so cropped bodies / sensors appear to impact DOF because they are shooting at a longer focal length to achieve the same look. That’s one reason why cropped systems struggle to get as good bokeh / subject separation as full frame systems.

There are other factors regarding sharpness that could be at play. Most lenses have a sweet spot for sharpness at a particular f-stop (or focal length if it’s a zoom lens), which is not usually wide open.