this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
208 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

85708 readers
5594 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

IMO that is sheer incompetence on the part of the traffic engineer who designed it.

[–] lemmysir@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, but remaking it is probably too expensive for the town sadly. It has been complained about

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

They don't have to rebuild the intersection; they just have to redo the signal timing so that the thru green for the bike lane isn't in the same phase as the right turn green for the general purpose lane. (Okay, so they might have to add a right arrow signal head too. Still, cheaper than new pavement.)

They just don't want to do it because it would probably reduce level of service for cars and they don't care enough about cyclists' safety to make that trade-off.

[–] lemmysir@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

That is probably true sadly. Getting things changed sometimes seems impossible