this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
292 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

85708 readers
4363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BipolarSilence@lemmy.cafe 13 points 7 hours ago

Ok so the thing is, when you get hit by small car you usually tend to roll over the top w some injuries. You can't really do that when its a giant truck/SUV the height of you and you end up rolling under their BIGASS SUSPENDED VEHICLE

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 11 points 8 hours ago

There are very harsh fines for driving with a phone elsewhere. And smaller vehicles and better infra for pedestrians.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I thought big trucks and SUVs were doing it - at least that's what a different headline said.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

SUVs don't kill people, but phones apparently do

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

So a good guy with an SUV can stop a bad guy with a phone? I think im getting it

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Since it's a US-only phenomenon, looking at vehicle types popular in the US seems like a good starting place, but that assumes phone use affects people's awareness of their surroundings uniformly - I would want to confirm that by ruling out cultural differences between countries.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Big Trucks and SUVs are much deadlier than proper cars in case of accidents. Pedestrian infrastructure does not exist in most parts of the US or is very dangerous to use and those parts of the US that do are often unaffordable for regular people to live in. People also do not expect pedestrians even if there is infrastructure of that kind. Roads in the US are designed to maximise the danger to pedestrians even if there is pedestrian infrastructure because of car first regulations ...

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

My hypothesis is that the rise in distracted driving was just as bad in European countries but they have safer infrastructure that limits cars' speed and otherwise protects pedestrians, and I think that could be tested by looking at the rates of car crashes overall in Europe (if those went up at the same time as the US without a corresponding rise in dead pedestrians I think that'd suggest their infrastructure is the difference)

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 4 points 8 hours ago

Speed isn't really a factor here, as many European speed limits are higher than US ones, but there is at leaat some separation between vehicles and pedestrians. It's not rocket science - vehicles and fleshy water bags don't mix well

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

We have pedestrian friendly infrastructure and we don't drive penis size compensating trucks. Cars close to pedestrians are forced to go slow and if they would swivel off the road, the curbs and other stuff like trees are there to stop cars before they hit anyone, or force the wheels away from the sidewalks to steer the car back on the road. So even when people are dumb enough to be on their phone, the risk of a fatal accident with a pedestrian is limited. Giant trucks just ram over and through everything, splashing any pedestrian in their path. Especially if there aren't any sidewalks and cars are allowed to drive really fast. Contrary to the US we actually value human lives so we built our cities to be safe for bikes and pedestrians.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 63 points 17 hours ago (9 children)
[–] moonleay@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago

Sorry to be like this, but what is this link?

I get redircted outside of my Lemmy App (because it is a 3rd party URL) and then get advertised a Lemmy client, which I don't even like, only for its page to only show a preview and in order to actually view the linked post I have to open the original WebUI of the Lemmy instance linked on the advertising page of voyager?

And it got the balls to tell me that its the best experience?

What the fuck Voyager??

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 85 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Screenshot for compatibility reasons on fedi. So that it's loud and fucking clear cYG535wdK04APVS.jpg

[–] rhythmisaprancer@quokk.au 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ijustliketrains@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Settings > General > Other > Share Links

[–] rhythmisaprancer@quokk.au 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you mean. I don't use voyager, and find it to be off putting that voyager would share a link in such a way that is essentially an ad for itself.

I shared the direct link for the rest of us 🙂 it doesn't seem that ! is needed anymore.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They are telling Voyager users how to modify that setting. We have options, but apparently the default is a Voyager specific link.

[–] rhythmisaprancer@quokk.au 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting choice by Voyager. But it is nice that there are apps available for fediverse users who want them!

[–] T4V0@lemmy.pt 1 points 47 minutes ago

While Voyager is a nice app, that's offputting for me as well. Just changed it! Glad I didn't share a link yet.

[–] QuadratureSurfer@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago

Thanks! I didn't realize we could change that.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Kind of?

It's not just that the outside of the vehicles are big.

The inside is too, so a lot of people can barely see over the dash on the best of days, so glancing down at a phone means taking their eyes fully off the road. In a sedan they'd at least maintain a periphery view of the road, which allows for unconscious sight and reactions.

Like how "daredevil blindness" is real and some people are blind but will duck if you throw a wrench at their head.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 8 points 16 hours ago (12 children)

The A pillars (the pillar between the windshield and driver/passenger door window) have gotten so massive due to airbag requirements that it blocks a significant view angle. It used to be that they were an inch wide.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 18 points 14 hours ago (9 children)

Since the article clearly states that even Canada—where we drive the same vehicles and have some similar infrastructure issues—isn't showing the same uptick, the most likely reasons are legal/regulatory or cultural rather than physical. In other words, there's more going on here than just oversized SUVs with bad collision outcomes for pedestrians (although they certainly don't help).

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kobra@lemmy.zip 22 points 15 hours ago

Doesn't mention anything about infrastructure and I'd guess that has a lot to do with it in the US. Very, very few cities are setup with any type of pedestrian traffic or public transport in mind.

[–] Gormadt@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 hours ago

Because we basically drive tanks everywhere on roads designed for incredible speed.

So basically our cars are the main culprit making the side issues worse.

[–] _deleted_@aussie.zone 19 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

In Australia, it’s illegal to use a phone while driving. (Although police aren’t hesitant to hand out fines and penalties, people do still use their phones while driving). There is also a cultural recognition and discouragement towards phone use while driving which is slowly changing accepted behaviour, similar to the slow change away from tolerating and encouraging drunk driving over the past few decades.

[–] darklamer@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

In Australia, it’s illegal to use a phone while driving.

Well, duh, obviously it's illegal to use a phone while driving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deliciEsteva@piefed.world 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

What in the holy AI slop is that?

I actually took the time to read it. Just to check it out. Wow! It's kinda hilarious how bad it is. It hits right about every AI stereotype. It even references some redditor 😂

This is pure, lazy bait slop

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

"Some kind Redditor"

-whew- you weren't kidding

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›