this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
310 points (95.9% liked)

Privacy

49397 readers
837 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Daniel Berntsson, founder of Mullvad, gave a personal donation of 5 million SEK (roughly 450,000€) in 2025 to Örebropartiet. This enormous donation accounted for 72% of the party’s revenue in 2025.

How does this affect Mullvad’s legitimacy as a company advocating for a free and open internet, while also funding a political party whose agenda seem to contradict these values? The official party website (in Swedish) can be found via the link below.

https://orebropartiet.se/om-oss/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Wondering if it's time that we as an anti-authoritarian left community, establish our own VPN...

[–] Quistermark@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Nym existe i thing their founders are anarchist. But don't know if they are trust worthy. The people involve seam decent https://nym.com/about

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 23 hours ago

What do you consider to be "anti-authoritarian left?"

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Anything shared here would inevitably be (or become) a honeypot. If you want a community-driven VPN, it would need to be something like Tor. Individual nodes being hosted by the community, and a zero-trust system to ensure no single node sees enough traffic to ID users.

But the issue with this is that a malicious actor (like the government) could simply spin up enough nodes to be able to capture the system. A zero-trust system like Tor is only secure because it is large. It’s not economical for a single actor to run enough nodes to reliably capture all three connections in the chain. But if it’s a small group (like Lemmy) starting up their own system, then it would be trivial for a larger organization to simply outnumber the two or three dozen safe nodes.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There's the I2P network too. Not a VPN as such, but there are exit nodes and you can run one yourself if you want.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it's a honeypot for fascists but not one for antifascists, maybe. But I'd prefer no honeypot at all, rather one where governance is from the labourers, to the labourers.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A VPN operated exclusively for a single political group would flag everyone using it as that group.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, I suppose a VPN operated by those supporting that group, then.

[–] whatiswrongwithyou@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Not a honeypot, but a target. I see.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago

Soo, TOR but without the multiple nodes and CIA?

[–] sudo@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

RiseUp VPN already exists. I trust that they aren't feds but I also assume the feds have snuck some sort of spyware on them asap.