this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
308 points (96.4% liked)

News

38500 readers
1876 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Science Advances report also finds people of color and low-income residents in US disproportionately affected

Using a gas stove increases nitrogen dioxide exposure to levels that exceed public health recommendations, a new study shows. The report, published Friday in Science Advances, found that people of color and low-income residents in the US were disproportionately affected.

Indoor gas and propane appliances raise average concentrations of the harmful pollutant, also known as NO2, to 75% of the World Health Organization’s standard for indoor and outdoor exposure.

That means even if a person avoids exposure to nitrogen dioxide from traffic exhaust, power plants, or other sources, by cooking with a gas stove they will have already breathed in three-quarters of what is considered a safe limit.

When you’re using a gas stove, you are burning fossil fuel directly in the home,” said Yannai Kashtan, lead author of the study and a PhD candidate at Stanford University. “Ventilation does help but it’s an imperfect solution and ultimately the best way is to reduce pollution at the source.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)

I want to say now since we just got one that modern glass-top electric stoves are pretty great. They heat up quickly and they're very easy to clean. So the latter part is already a huge advantage over gas stoves.

We didn't even get a fancy one or anything. A basic model.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

They heat up quickly and they’re very easy to clean.

I keep seeing people say this as a benefit of glass-top electrics, but this has never been the case with any one of those I've used. A boil-over invariably leaves a grimy black ring that can't be scrubbed off even with hours of scrubbing. So they end up looking grimy.

Meanwhile, my sealed gas burners are easy to get clean. I just sweep up the crumbs and then dump some boiling water and a couple drops of dish soap and wipe it up.

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I just spent almost two weeks on vacation in an apartment with an induction stove. I've had gas my whole life. I was impressed. It heated the pans faster and more evenly, the temperature was more tuneable and it was easy to clean.

While standard resistive stoves do get those rings, the inductive one almost certainly wouldn't, because the glass only gets heated by the pan, rather than the other way around.

The only difficulty was the Samsung UX. It was a bit of a chore to get the pan centered on the coil, and there was insufficient feedback when you got it right or wrong and if it wasn't in the right place it just wouldn't work. I got used to it, but I'd have liked some better markings, and an LED ring that would show when it was on. It also didn't automatically heat the pan quickly on startup. You had to set it to 9, then back off, otherwise it would heat the pan on a duty cycle.

If I were to upgrade my kitchen, I'd absolutely go with induction. However, even beyond my usual research, I'd make damn sure I got the best option on this. I love cooking too much to screw it up.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We were going to go with induction, but it was just too expensive.

[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My main beef is that I have pretty thorough knowledge of appliance warranties and induction stoves are near impossible to repair. I think it's partially because the techs don't know how they actually work, so getting an accurate diagnosis was rough. Most of the time they had to be replaced outright.

If I were to get one I'd probably get a countertop one with a single burner so that if it fails I don't have to replace the whole induction range, I can just replace that single point of failure.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You also need specific cookware and we'd have to replace a lot of ours.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What were you using to clean? I've been able to get those rings off with the regular glass cooktop cleaner and a little elbow grease. You could probably use something a little more abrasive but still glass-safe if you wanted.

My main issue was it's harder to get greases off completely instead of leaving a slight streaky film, but that's mostly just an aesthetic concern.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Induction, or just standard electric burners under glass?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Same. The upgrade in cleaning effort is beyond words. These are what the "rich people" had when I was a teenager. I've just inherited my first. I yearn for the induction model, though.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I bought an induction hot plate that I keep on the counter next to the stovetop. Not only do I get a fifth burner, it heats up confusingly fast. It’s incredible for boiling a large pot of water.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Love my new induction stove! Our old gas stove was leaking and could have blown up the house. We've noticed a lot less waste heat too, metal pan handles can be grabbed without a hot pad, the kitchen doesn't heat up as much from cooking. And it heats up blazingly fast.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Given the EPAs policy on natural gas leaks was to ask the gas companies if they've noticed anything, I'd say we've got some distance to go on stopping the sale of natural gas stoves.

Climate Town has a good video on this subject - and others - that might be a good watch.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The biggest problem with leaving gas stoves is all the older homes that simply are not equipped for them. Many homes with gas not only lack 240v 30a outlets in their kitchens, they may have only 100 or even 60 amp service and may not be able to even add such a circuit. Upgrading to electric could easily cost homeowners 5 figures.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Also want to shout out Technology Connections' video.

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Folks this is a garbage study. N=18, and then extrapolating the dangers based on aggregated stats of disease states?

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah. I still want an induction stove, but this doesn't look good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

NO2 exposure hazards are already known, see the references in this study. This is only looking at NO2 production in homes, so I don't think 18 is too small a sample size. It's not like they're trying to determine whether burning natural gas produces NO2, that's a given. They're looking at how much, how factors like hoods and airflow affect it, and how it goes throughout the house, not just in the kitchen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

In NYC, this is actually a major concern since most kitchens don't even have ventilation. Of my four apartments here, only one has had any form of ventilation in the kitchen.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm surprised that's even legal.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Are you really? NY's housing market is an absolute scam. Landlords are allowed to neglect their buildings until it gets so bad that the punishment for neglect is Riker's since any fines get taken out on their tenants. Something like 80% of residential buildings are owned by corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I get it. I do. But electric stoves are just meh. Gas burns quicker and more evenly. But if it comes down to it and I need to switch I will no problem. I just wish there was a solution to the cooking with gas issue as it cooks best imo

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Induction is the fastest and most even.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They are also more expensive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We don't have a gas stove but we do have a gas fireplace and water heater that have saved us a couple times now in winter when we've had prolonged power outages due to severe ice storms snapping half the trees in the area and taking all the power lines with them. This allowed us to have heat and hot water and if we had a gas stove, cooking as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

I feel like this is considered common sense. Burning anything indoors increases exposure to bad chemicals. Well ventilated areas are required and we don't have good regulation on that. Improve air quality with safe daily consumption and enforce it. Invest in public transportation, what is a safe level to reduce our exhaust output. People and companies then hold them responsible. : Common sense stuff

[–] kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

Wait until you find out about wood burning stoves and firepits. What they do to air quality inside your home even when you don't have either is scary

Chud cocks shotgun

"Gonna take mah stove outta my cold dead hands."

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I'm guessing this is a non issue in a well ventilated area?

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

"Well-ventilated" being a higher standard than you'd probably expect, but yes. Standard over-range extractor isn't doing enough.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›