this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
138 points (98.6% liked)

News

23311 readers
4804 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If an airplane has to be evacuated, the Federal Aviation Administration says all passengers must be capable of getting outwithin 90 seconds. 

But critics say the agency’s testing standards have not kept pace with the shrinking size of airplane seats — which means more people jammed into the cabin — or the changing composition of the flying public. 

“This is ridiculous. This is not how we travel today,” said U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) in an interview.

Duckworth argues the FAA’s current tests fail to take real world conditions into consideration.

They did not mimic the seat density of a modern aircraft. They had no carry-on baggage. They had nobody over the age of 60 and nobody under the age of 18,” said Duckworth, a former Army helicopter pilot who lost both her legs in the Iraq war.

They didn’t have anybody with a disability. Of course they were able to evacuate the aircraft in 90 seconds,” she said.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 53 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if they forced planes to have reasonable seats again! I'd love to be able to sit without my knees jammed in the seat in front of me.

I'm not even that tall. My father-in-law literally can't fit in a regular seat due to his height.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 18 points 6 months ago

Bad news is us tall guys get bruised knees from the seats. Good news is we get to watch everything everyone is doing on the screens in front of us. I watched like ten movies at once on the last flight I was on.

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s really one of the only benefits I have by being a small man. Economy isn’t that bad for me

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You can probably do way more pull-ups than me (a tall man), so that's a plus.

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

lol yeah probably true, but I also do martial arts and workout a lot, so I can probably do more pull ups than most people, even short kings

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Imagine if the institutions that are meant to oversee and regulate industries for our safety hadn't been gutted and neutered by capitalists.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Conservative voters get conservative solutions.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I'm with Duckworth that the evacuation standards should take those things into account, but it gets complicated quickly. Where should people with diabilities be seated? They are frequently at the front, but not always. How would you even simulate an average or 'normal' amount of disabilities?

But it doesn't require any specific portion of specific types of passengers.

Minimum seat and row sizes to allow space to allow easier assistance with evacuation would address a lot of those situations. Being packed in makes helping someone with a physical issue or an injury easier far more difficult, even more than the impact on able bodied people trying to squeeze out more people than the plane was designed for. If rows were required to have plenty of space in front of the seat it would make space available to assist the known number of people that aren't able to get themselves out on their own. Plus it would make it easier to get out the fewer number of able bodied people faster and it would be more comfortable to fly. Win, win for everyone and safety!

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago

You monster! Think what that would do to the shareholder's value!

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What I'm wondering is, how many deaths are attributable to slow evacuation? Usually, you only hear about the great catastrophies where the entire plan crashes into a mountain and evacuation was never an option.

But how many accidents cause a situation where quick emergency evacuations are actually needed? I have absolutely no intuition about that.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago

The flight polited by Captain Sully that crashed in a river would be the type of crash that has a timeline due to the plane sinking. Another situation with a need for a fast evacuation is a fire. Both are fairly rare because of all of the other safety measures taken when a metal tube filled with fuel takes off and lands over water.

People dying in either scenario because of a pursuit of profits would be terrible.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

how many deaths are attributable to slow evacuation

You mean like the Station Fire?

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The easy answer to the disabled question is the row right behind the first class bulkhead. Well, removing that row and using the second row for the disabled.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 3 points 6 months ago

Ok, now imagine there are more people than fit in one row on the same flight. Or a group of elderly people with mobility issues that are not 'disabled'.

Also people with back problems, that have a hard time squeezing out of tight rows. Pregnant people 9 months along. Someone who just had leg surgery. Or a group of 30 people with mobility issues who are all going to a conference about mobility issues.

One row is not enough. They could sacrifice 10% of rows and give all of the other rows a significantly more space on most planes.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They can just add a lever that dumps everyone out the bottom. Problem solved.

[–] doubletwist@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Why do we even have that lever?!"

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 6 months ago

Do you want everyone off the plane in 90 seconds or not?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago

Pretty sure Boeing has this feature.

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

like any of these assholes live in the real world

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Wait, why does carryon baggage matter? In an emergency, you leave it behind.

[–] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 17 points 6 months ago

If it's not shoved under the seat in front of you properly it can be a tripping hazard and slow things down, plus if the overhead bins don't stay latched well because they weren't maintained well (which is a thing I've seen often) then any emergency could possibly have thrown that into the aisle.

I dunno, it makes sense to at least look at it further.

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

With how overstuffed the interior of planes has become since the check-bag fees got so high, I think it would silly not to simulate that much more stuff. Empty bags in all the overheads and stuffed bags under every seat.