this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
140 points (98.6% liked)

Fediverse

27830 readers
105 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SGG@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope other governments, small and large, start doing this.

[–] laurens@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Germany (social.bund.de) and the EU (social.network.europa.eu) already have it. I think it's very likely that other governments, especially european ones, will start to do this.

With the internet being so dominated by american voices, I dont think a lot of people have fully appreciated the sentiment change in the higher levels of european governments. Sovereign control over their digital spaces is something that is actually mattering on the level of nation states. Its a way of thinking that is kind of new to most people, as we rarely think about the sovereign powers of nation states, and even less so in the context of the internet. But now were starting to do that again, and it actually matters.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

With the internet being so dominated by american voices, I dont think a lot of people have fully appreciated the sentiment change in the higher levels of european governments.

Absolutely. I was on an instance, run by North Americans, that had blocked European Govt instances because they didn’t trust government agencies spying on them etc. Some German users picked up on this and voiced a lot of frustration over it. There was a clear cultural divide. Even more ironic, I think it was the German department of privacy or something to that effect.

Nonetheless, it was quite interesting to see a tension between the small hacker aspect of the fediverse and the “this is the new internet” aspect and how much the US dominated perspective probably completely missed the mark.

EDIT: European Govt from “European” to clarify I was referring to government run instances.

[–] Onionizer@geddit.social 2 points 1 year ago

How does federating two public instances enable spying

[–] fediverse_report@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ha yeah I remember that, that was fun.

To riff on this a little bit further: its also visible in how little attention in the gazillion conversations about Threads is paid to the fact that the entirety of the EU cannot even access it yet due to the new DMA and DSA.

Or one of the articles I wrote that got relatively low traction, that was specificially about how all of the Nordic countries got an official recommendation to use ActivityPub for their governmental communications. I dont mind that some articles get less traction than others, but it does stand out when you consider how impactful such things are for the long term structure of the fediverse. Lots of EU governments are now talking about needing sovereign public digital spaces, and are actively looking how ActivityPub can help with that. And that matters way more than whatever Elons latest shenanigans are.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

ha yeah I remember that, that was fun.

Hey! I was trying to be vague and anonymous!! 😅

But yea ... totally with you!!

For those that don't know, this person is the author of https://fediversereport.com/ and posts here like this.

@fediverse_report@lemmy.ml ... you could add more links and what not to your bio here ... ?

[–] moitoi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

With the internet being so dominated by american voices,

Europe has to build something new that isn't a big corp, that isn't centralized. It has to find its own way, and the Fediverse model is a good beginning. It's to show we can do something but in the European spirit.

[–] experbia@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is great. This is how it always should have been.

Organization of any kind needs a Twitter page or subreddit? No, they need their own official, self-controlled Mastodon instance anyone can see and listen to and interact with, even without accounts on that specific instance. They need their own kbin or Lemmy instance to make and administer their community on and have control over, everyone can still participate even without signing up for accounts on that specific instance.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don’t see governments or companies using gmail, now do you. Well, small unprofessional companies do, but everyone else has a domain, website, mail server and all the usual internet infrastructure in place. Why should companies and governments use TweetBook or Snapstargram for official communication when they can host their own instance. For the time being, the problem has been that large majority of the people are using these unstable platforms, so companies decided to follow.

tons of large companies use gmail lol

[–] SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They've done a lot of stupid things lately, but this isn't one of them.

Governments should be using open platforms and open source software.

[–] Koffiato@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely! Using open source software is much cheaper, as well. Hiring developers to work on open source software/OSs would cost less than buying software annually. Governments pay stupid amounts of money for easily replaceable software.

[–] CodeMonkeyDance@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why. So they become less secure? Propriatery software has its uses /s

[–] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes and how is the developer supposed to earn their money when they can't spy on people and insert ads?!!!!!!!1111

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

in the future:

"Ireland.ir and Scot.land has defederated from the England.UK.gov. The Prime minister will be addressing his Instance shortly"

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine a world where every government has its own instance.

"Breaking News: North Korea has defederated from the United States, as well as hundreds of other countries."

[–] zuhayr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"The Russian federation defederated Ukraine."

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

You claim to be a federation, yet you've shown that you are actually a defederation.

[–] tesfabpel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"The Russian federation defederates itself."

[–] sgtlighttree@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More like it tried to forcibly merge the instances

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Denies there is such a thing as a Ukrainian instance.

[–] Mihuy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wow, I never thought about this, but this is probably pretty good to have right? Might be a good way to find info about something if their sites are really confusing etc possibly

[–] Redonkulation@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is really fascinating to me. It would be interesting to see each country set up their own Mastodon/Lemmy/Kbin/other federated systems and have those instances constantly talk to each other. Like others have commented, It seems like a great way to keep the communication style and interaction of twitter/facebook, while also protecting the validity of the information through private instances. Really smart decision.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Excellent use case.

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Italy will follow soon 🤥

[–] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

And all other EU countries. Then crimew.gay will defederate them all later.

[–] vojel@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn a government that actually do something in terms of digitilization.

Cries in German …

[–] matt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's weird that you use Germany as an example when Germany has been on Mastodon since 2020 at https://social.bund.de!

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried to start a Mastodon account, but I got the error message "Validation failed: time zone not included in list"

[–] KiofKi@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Soo... you're located on Mars?

[–] Epicurus0319@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, other governments should be doing this. (But even if they use threads instead, mastodon users’ll see their updates anyway if mastodon feds with it)

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

threads will never federate.

[–] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think it was just a fake promise? I haven't thought about it, but it's certainly possible.

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I think it was posturing to the countries that banned Twitter.

look, you get your own Threads in Iran.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fact that a state government used a commercial service to inform the public is absurd, and this was bound to happen eventually.

[–] Skitals@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Governments have been PAYING to inform the public via commercial services for... ever? And requiring citizens to do the same. Have you ever seen a public notice in a newspaper? At least posting on Twitter is free (for now).

[–] Miqo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

At least posting on Twitter is free (for now).

"For now", is right. That isn't always the case.

[–] Doodoocaca@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Why is it absurd? The best way to reach people is on the platforms they use. People are not going to install some government app or use a special website to see those kinds of messages.