this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
261 points (98.2% liked)

News

37762 readers
3053 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In just a few days, drugstores like Walgreens will have it in stock, for everyone. Here’s how to use it, and who it will help.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theredroom@midwest.social 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is a good step forward for accessibility, but unfortunately, the $50 price tag will still put it out of the hands of many who need it. It should be handed out, for free, to anybody who wants it. There's zero downsides. It cannot be misused, diverted, or abused. It has no other uses. It has no effect on someone not ODing. It cannot benefit anyone in any possible way... unless they are actually dying right now. If we were serious about saving lives, we would be gladly giving it out. Hell, put it in free vending machines on the street. It would be the ultimate pro-life move. But, of course, in a capitalist hellscape, profit motive is of utmost importance. How about drug cos. making billions off opiods foot the bill? Thankfully, there are many great harm reduction organizations that do hand it out free, but the easier to get, the less people die. I recommend anyone pick up some, if you can find it for free, even if you don't think you'd need it. Home/work/car, you never know what might happen in your vicinity. It's like the modern Heimlich Maneuver. Ok... that's my PSA for the day.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

Replying to top comment for vis:

All you said is correct. Quick PSA, narcan is a temporary opioid blocker. If you administer narcan to an actual OD patient, they will rise to a higher level of consciousness. They may even be able to walk and talk.

They NEED to go to the hospital though, the opioids are still in their system, and once the narcan wears off they can drop into respiratory distress again.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Seriously, you can just inject it without any harm?

I was at the CNE in Toronto recently and they had a free narcan table. The person was busy so I walked by. Now i regret not waiting

The city I live in has a fairly bad homeless problem and drug use that comes with it. Just last week I walked past some office workers who had to call an ambulance on a guy that was having troubles, not sure what the trouble was. The guy seemed out of it but was eating a sandwich but just out of it. The ambulance showed up as I walked past. And this is a common sight at lunch.

I should have grabbed a kit just in case

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You don't inject it, it's a nasal spray

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is why I didn't think I could handle the responsibilities.

[–] theredroom@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago

Initially, it was only given by injection, but now it's common in the nasal spray. That's what's great about the nasal route, it's unintimidating and you can't fuck it up. ...I guess unless you squirt it in their ear or something. lol

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Well, if you touched the applicator it would be quickly obvious

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

be careful the guy that you wake up with narcan doesn't punch you in the face

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

My parents have plenty of stories to tell of patients dying of an OD being pissed at them for 'ruining their high'

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wow, I didn't know it wasn't. That is crazy!

[–] SymphonicResonance@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

It was previously available behind the counter but a prescription was not needed .

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Now it's time for conservatives to crow about how this is a bad thing and not have a good reason why.

[–] theredroom@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And betray their pro-life stance, once again. As George Carlin said:

"They're all in favor of the unborn. They will do anything for the unborn. But once you're born, you're on your own. Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with the fetus from conception to nine months. After that, they don't want to know about you. They don't want to hear from you. No nothing. No neonatal care, no day care, no head start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you're preborn, you're fine; if you're preschool, you're fucked."

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Except even that isn't true. Do you see them pushing for free pre-natal care? If there's something wrong with your fetus that can be fixed through medical care and you can't afford it, fuck you and your baby, lady.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

why in the fuck would it not be to begin with

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Conservatives don't want it?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

i don't know. i think there are many inconsequential things you can't buy over the counter in the united states. i have to wonder if it's a health insurance complex thing.

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean health insurance plays a part in it. Conservatives don't want to pay tax money on narcan for people they consider valueless when they are already paying for their own health care. How do I know they think they are valueless? They don't want them to have access to a life savings thing. Also plenty will just straight up tell you that if you ask.