this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
52 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

59472 readers
3747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The $53,000 Connection: The High Cost of High-Speed Internet for Everyone::Officials doling out billions of dollars for broadband in rural America are struggling to decide when a new hookup costs too much

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This just feels like a repeat of Rural Electrification: yeah it's expensive and not immediately profitable, but we're at the point where it's necessary to be a part of modern society.

[–] Steve 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And just like then. The feds should require every home to have a fiber line installed. Don't even give them money to do it. Just tell them they need to get it done themselves, or the government will do it without them.

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

Don't even give them [more ]money[, again,] to do it.

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agree in the ideal, but in practice fiber is often still unavailable in suburban areas and even urban ones too, in the US.

I'm no expert, but it seems much more efficient to prioritize those areas over rural ones.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yep.

And allowing it to concentrate in areas centralizes wealth in those areas.

If you live in an area where your only internet option is satellite, your net worth is probably low, or you're retired.

Doesn't need to be this way.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

In 2023, broadband internet should seen as a utility like water and electricity. Build it.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[–] neblem@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Even if that is an accurate number, there are only ~56 million Americans living in census defined rural areas. With some actual planning we should be able to get missing backbones from our urban areas (which should be getting far more funding). Wireless is also a gamechanger, with microwave, 5g (and nextgen 6g), and Starlink, and that can really reduce this cost since not everyone needs fiber. If we can incorporate requirements for new backbone lines with any greenfield rail or highway projects we can get wireless coverage out faster and cheaper.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

And that's why Starlink has a huge potential market... lazy and greedy ISPs. You would think launching thousands of satellites into space would be more expensive than laying down some cables on land, but...