this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
133 points (100.0% liked)

News

38197 readers
2203 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17027148

In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws.

Quick explanation for those too lazy for links, and haven't see the posts with different coverages.

What's Chevron?

  • Chevron was a judicial doctrine where upon review courts would have to accept any reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous law from gov agencies.

What's the Impact of it Being Gone?

  • These agencies can still issue ruling but courts don't have to accept them in cases when there is another reasonable interpretation.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You just wait, by all accounts, we're gonna put our own fash prime minister with a huge majority next year. I am very afraid.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trudeau is facing a major insurrection as we speak, so I hope not. Nobody actually likes that rat-faced little fucker Poilievre — they just want Trudeau gone.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Agreed. But I'm very afraid. I don't know if they'll be able to make him step down, and I don't know if an alternative would be able to close the gap with pipsqueak.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

how fucked am I on the housing front? I'm somewhere between poor and not poor

ty in advance

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Pretty fucked unless you're willing to move to a village at least 1 hour's drive from the nearest city of 100k population. A detached house in my neck of the woods is about 400k CAD and up. Rents start at around 1500 for something decent.

[–] MMNT@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Wow! Blackrock really destroyed Canada's housing.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

That'd be a bit excessive, this change doesn't mean the courts can't/won't still accept executive interpretations or that executive rule making is dead. It also doesn't prohibit the delegation of authority from the legislature to the executive branch, it just requires that they do so explicitly. This ruling returned the legal paradigm on part of admin law to a pre-Reagan state.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago

Can I petition to just have you adopt all of Minnesota?

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 2 years ago

this is a decision not many people will hear about, but all of us will suffer from

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago

Hot on the heels of the debate that pushed the probability of a Trump presidency higher comes another decision in a string of decisions undercutting regulatory power. Boy are corps gonna wipe the floor with workers if Trump wins. 😔

[–] tover153@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 2 years ago

Combining several recent court decisions, is there a list somewhere with how much I need to "tip" to overturn a federal agency rule I don't like? Do I need to "tip" multiple levels of judiciary, or can I just "tip" at the top?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

ke-rist. What a shitshow.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 years ago

If we clone harambe, will things get better?