this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
42 points (92.0% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3201 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Another day, another battery breakthrough.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Dry coated electrodes are pretty legit, and lots of manufacturers are starting to build up scaled manufacturing processes and tooling for it. It’s not a lab R&D thing anymore. This is going be a thing shortly.

This one is at the end of the R&D pipeline. Technology advances can take a good 10-20 years before they’re available in consumer products.

If you read the article, you can see that this isn’t a new research paper. It’s a company telling its consumers and investors when they plan to have production at scale.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The hype shit is getting tiring...

Everything is a break through now... Then it never really happens lol

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Eh let's not pretend battery tech isn't advancing rapidly. Yes the over-hyped headlines are annoying but battery tech is moving forward at breakneck speeds.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

The Internet is terrible at understanding R&D timelines. We’re operating on timelines that can be 10-20 years from R&D to a consumer products. It’s been this way forever. NASA’s tech advancements were a great example of this.

If you want check on the progress of big scientific advancements, you can’t be looking back at the papers published last year, you need to look back at the papers published a decade ago.

And that all being said, this specific tech is at the end of R&D pipeline. It’s going into scaled manufacturing. It’s going to be a thing you can buy soon.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There's been a toxic positivity in battery development news. It comes so often, and the results seemingly never appearing, that people wave off every advancement.

I've seen people argue that there is no advancement at all (there certainly has been), or that sodium batteries won't happen (you can already buy them). This is completely ignorant, but there's a reason people feel it's correct.

Leaks over to renewable tech, too. Saw one guy argue we'd run out of pervskovites for solar panels.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

This thing is happening though. If you look up “dry coated electrodes,” you’ll see that this has been in development for over a decade, and manufacturers are now starting to build manufacturing lines for this. It’s not a lab experiment anymore, this is going into mass production.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Now imagine if companies were incentivized to share information like this...

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

When money is on the table, this will never happen

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's easy - rock up with a pile of money representing how much this break through is worth to you, if it's enough, they'll license it to you. Don't understand?

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's not sharing, that is selling

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Just proposing a way to incentivise the sharing you wanted. If you want this kind of thing to be public domain so everyone can take advantage of it then the public needs to pay for the research to happen.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Manufacturing improvement for dry-coating the cathode and anode. Tesla currently dry coats the anode but not the cathode.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I think LG is a little disingenuous there calling themselves the leader.

Tesla is mass producing 10s of millions of cells with a dry coated anode and has plans to do the cathode as well (Edit and can in the lab just like LG)

LG says this is going to be for both in 2028 on a pilot line, as if they won't have their own problems at scale as well.

By 2028 what makes them think Tesla won't have both going as well, while they've yet to finish building the factory?

Is anyone else actually mass producing dry anodes yet other than Tesla?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So this just dropped today - https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-mass-production-dry-electrode-4680-cells-end-of-2024-report/

Tesla might start producing the dry cathode this year. Lets say they still have more troubles though and say sometime in 2025.

looks at calendar - Yep, that's before 2028!