this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
88 points (91.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35791 readers
1371 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When someone is "shit"... That's bad

When someone "ain't shit"... That's also bad

When someone is "the shit"... That's good!

???

Please help

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 54 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

First you have an association of anything bad with excrements. This is cross-linguistically fairly common, and really old*.

From that "shit = bad" meaning, you got semantic amelioration generating the "the shit = the best". English slang does this fairly often; refer to "sick", "dope", "wicked" doing the same. I'm not sure but I think that the underlying process is:

  • "shit" as "extremely bad" →
  • "shit" as "notably, outstandingly bad" →
  • "shit" as "notable, outstanding" →
  • "shit" as "noteworthy, good"

That also explains why "it ain't shit" is generally negative - it conveys "it isn't noteworthy".


*It's so old that one of Martial's Epigrams (liber III, epigram 17), in 1st century Latin, already shows this:

Circumlata diu mensis scribilita secundis urebat nimio saeva calore manus; sed magis ardebat Sabidi gula: protinus ergo sufflavit buccis terque quaterque suis. illa quidem tepuit digitosque admittere visa est, sed nemo potuit tangere: merda fuit.

A tart [scribilita], passed and passed around at dessert, cruelly burnt our hands with its excessive heat. But Sabidius’ greed was more fiery still; so forthwith he blew on it with his cheeks three or four times. The tart cooled to be sure, and seemed ready to admit our fingers, but nobody could touch it. It was filth.

I'm copypasting the translation out of laziness, but... it is not accurate. "Merda" is not just filth, it's literally "shit" - and it's metaphoric as you'd use in English "that cheesecake was shit", same shit here.

[–] Zeratul@lemmus.org 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fucking well done comment, sir. Thank you

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 months ago

That comment is the shit!

[–] Blyfh@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Huh, I always thought "ain't shit" comes from "this is so bad, it ain't even shit". Was probably just my personal take to explain it.

[–] Dipbeneaththelasers@lemmy.today 30 points 4 months ago (4 children)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago

I’mma click, removing Google’s tracker first

https://youtu.be/igh9iO5BxBo

Oh yeah this guy he’s good!

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 months ago

He's the shit.

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

Saw the question and thought of exactly this video. Great skit.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Beat me to it. Perfect for this post.

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Bad words just become extreme. The modify the emotion. They often don't mean anything literally. You have to look for other clues or just memorize the terms.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Words don't all have meaning in isolation. :) The examples you give just have meaning based on the combination of words.

A bit like letters. We don't think "r" is contradictory because in "fart" it describes something foul and it "tart" it describes somerthing tasty.

[–] Eccentric@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

TL;DR: swear words like "shit" usually emphasize the mood of a sentence rather than add new meaning, which is why "shit" seems to change connotation across your examples. Think like the word "very".

Traditionally in most European languages, the cycle of what is considered most offensive shifts between bodily functions (shit, piss), genitalia and sexual acts (cunt, cock, fuck) and religious profanity (hell, bloody), particularly against the Christian God. Some scholars define us as moving into a new cycle, where the most offensive words are slurs based on race, sexuality, or gender. These scholars speculate that this results in more willingness to experiment with already existing swear words of the 'traditional' categories since they are considered less offensive in comparison.

Swear words are almost always used euphemistically and in set phrases. Some scholars go as far as to argue that swearing is only euphemistic and words used literally do not count as "swearing". In fact, much of swear word usage can be classified as an intensifier, which is a word or short phrase that sort of heightens the already existing mood of the sentence but doesn't explicitly change the meaning. Using shit as an example, "Shit, the bread's gone stale again." In this example, you can also see shit being used as a sort of mood marker, since it is reasonable to assume out of context that the bread going stale might be desirable to the speaker. In this case, the "shit" marks the stale bread is actually bad as well as intensifying the mood as compared to, say "oh darn, the bread's gone stale again."

This part is a bit of speculation on the origin of set phrases like "ain't shit" or "the shit" and I haven't actually read any scholarly literature on this topic specifically. You can see similarities between set phrases like "this is the shit" and "this is the stuff" and "that's the spot". It seems like this is a construction common in the English language to express that something is pleasurable. Whether this is what caused the "this is the shit" set phrase or whether the "this is the shit" set phrase caused the construction remains to be seen. "Ain't shit" is definitely somewhat different because it probably comes from African American Vernacular English (AAVE). While I would argue that "the shit" could be AAVE in origin as well, I do think it has roots in non AAVE English, whereas "ain't shit" is grammatically AAVE.

If you're interested in reading more, I recommend The F Word by Jesse Sheidlower and Holy Sh*t by Melissa Mohr.

[–] Toes@ani.social 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Their tone or inflection as well as context and social ques are important qualities to distinguish the intent.

Additionally, there are many idioms that you'll just need to know to properly get it. (You can think of idioms like kanji or memes if that helps.)

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I think they are pronounced shitiodms.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 months ago
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Shieeet: amazed, wow

Nice shit: good stuff

No shit: obvious

Holy shit: surprise

It's a swiss army knife of english word. Actually it's rather similar with mandarin, a single word alone mean something, adding different word front or behind will change its meaning.

For example, 害(haì) can mean something bad or harmful or causation, 害怕(haì pà) mean scared or fearful, while 厉害(lì haì) mean something awesome or incredible, and 受害者(shòu haì zhě) mean victim

[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

this is pretty essential

I would add:

Shit head: a negative term for a person who likely is toxic or caustic for other negative reasons

Shitter: a person who may enjoy shit head humor. One who shit is not necessarily negative like shit head. Could be used to casually downplay a type of humor (lightly positive) or to dismiss a type of behavior (lightly negative)

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

There's also "enshittification", which has an entire Wikipedia article solely about it. Everyone has heard about it at this point.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 6 points 4 months ago
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

When it comes to the mess that history has made of English, Susie Dent should be sought for guidance.

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago
[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

And don't forget the division. A piece of shit, is bad, like a car that won't start, or a selfish person. A big piece of shit or a huge piece of shit is worse, but it's never a whole shit, because then it would be The shit, and good.

[–] nikaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

"shit" expresses excitement. And just like excitement, that can be good or bad.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How about horseshit, apeshit, batshit, dogshit, and probably lots more. Each of these has a pretty specific use case

[–] rigamarole@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Not to mention bullshit.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

That shits wicked.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 1 points 4 months ago

This is more related to the definite vs indefinite article (the vs a) and how that changes meaning in English.