https://kagi.com/ if you haven't heard of it. Has been working well for me. I went from DDG to this.
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
63 points (95.7% liked)
DeGoogle Yourself
8541 readers
255 users here now
A community for those that would like to get away from Google.
Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!
Rules
-
Be respectful even in disagreement
-
No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.
-
No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.
Related communities
!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Same here.
Same here too
+1 for kagi. I tried it out with their trial offer and liked it enough to stay with it. Used DDG before that.
100% kagi. I only need google if looking for images/video. But otherwise kagi is significantly better than anything I’ve ever used. Worth the $10/mo I pay
Kagi is how I search now. Very, very occasionally search for something on Google in specific circumstances, buy otherwise it's all Kagi. Web has become a lot less noisy for me, and they label each search result with how many ads/trackers the site uses. Definitely have found smaller, "quieter" sites that have given me much better info, that hasn't been paid for.
Especially good for tech-review searches.
I'm hearing a lot of recommendations for Kagi. Maybe when I can afford another subscription service, but that time isn't right now.
I'm also not a fan of having all my searches potentially tied to one account, even if they say they respect privacy. Makes me very weary to try it.
$5/month is very steep, and it only includes 300 searches. There's no way Google makes that per month off of advertising to me, and I really don't see how $1/month wouldn't be more than enough to cover their costs.
Google has probably managed to reduce cost at scale. I'd expect kagis internal cost per search to go down with time. But they may not pass those saving onto the user.
Just remember that when something is free, you're the product.
I second this. It's paid, and I've only been using it a week, but I like it.
- so yeah, Google is Google, the very definition of SEO – to the point now they will completely ignore your query to show you “relevant” results
- and Bing is Microsoft, ’nuff said – although I hear they seem to be THE choice for porn searches …
- people have been claiming DuckDuckGo has become just a frontend for Bing which is why their results have been declining 🤷
- ad tech company System1 owns a majority stake of Startpage – apparently they’ve mollified PrivacyTools that it would not impact Startpage’s privacy focused mission
- Qwant out of France actually seems to be stepping up as a good netizen, not only focusing on privacy but also investing in privacy initiatives in EU
- otherwise you’re stuck bouncing around ~~SearX~~ SearXNG instances – Google and Bing REALLY don’t like meta search engines and will regularly block overactive instances
EDIT: looks like SearX is pretty much dead and had been replaced by SearXNG
Qwant "The search engine that doesn't know anything about you, …"
Clicks on link: "Unfortunately we are not yet available in your country."
🤔
I mean … I suppose that’s marginally better than Google’s frontpage telling me what town I’m in?
I guess any site will have access to the address that is used to access them. The question is what do they do with it. Maybe Qwant has a bot that scans addresses and sends back this message if they are not operating in a specific country. Important thing is that they don't put any cookie in your navigator and don't keep any information after you've left.
Use a VPN
Qwant claims not to know anything about me, yet I've noticed its results are very much tailored to my location.
I realize this is just data any site can easily see based on my IP, but still it's one of my pet peeves. If I want to see information tailored to my general location, then I'll add the name of the location in the search field. I really hate how search engines try to be so "smart."
I'll give you an example of why it bugs me: The first time I ever looked at Tik Tok, I saw nothing but right-wing MAGA content, certainly based on the political climate where I live. I don't like sites trying to determine my interests based on the fact that I'm in [location].
The only ones that don't seem to tailor results based on my location are SearX instances and Startpage. I have the same misgivings about Startpage, though I use it fairly regularly, and I haven't noticed anything questionable, in spite of the fact that I deeply distrust System1. There's no way they bought into it out of the goodness of their hearts. We may still be in the "bait" stage of a bait-and-switch.
What's most annoying about the "tailored experience" is that they presume to know what you're looking for, even though you directly told them what to show you. They don't give a fuck about relevancy, they're going to show you whatever is going to make them the most money, which usually means corporate ad crap, and outrage news. Plus if they show you shit results then you'll search multiple times and they'll get to show you 4 times the ads.
Yes, and sometimes it's straight-up dangerous. I'm into longboarding, and I've noticed if you use a site like Google or Bing to search for the best longboards, you get swamped by Amazon affiliate sites recommending cheaply made junk that could end in injury or worse. But hey, at least someone profits. Yay capitalism!
Yay capitalism!
U.S.A! U.S.A!
These points seem to mirror my experience for the most part. DuckDuckGo has also been going downhill because certain search modifiers don't work anymore. Microsoft raised the price of API queries which in turn made it too expensive for DuckDuckGo to maintain certain ones. I mostly enjoyed it because it gives you access to Bing's search results without the user-hostile UX garbage Microsoft loves to put on all its products. These days I'm using Kagi. It's been about six months now and I'm really enjoying it.
I'd be curious to understand what Qwant brings extra to the table compared to DDG. Backend is the same, results seem quite similar and it's missing some things like math and conversion quick tools.
SearX or yacy are probably the best fit for this if you're looking to avoid manipulated results. Qwant seems pretty good too but I have only been using it for about a month.
metaphor is pretty good. it actually uses llm's as a way to generate links, rather than an unsourced mess of text.
Interesting, thanks
You need to be more specific about what you mean by "SEO garbage" because every search engine is going to put "SEOed" pages higher up.
I guess we all know that mean, some page are filled with just a bunch of keyword and no content to just raising it SEO and for visitor traffic.
swisscows?
view more: next ›