this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7133 readers
326 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anything over $3M should be taxed at 80% as it used to be. The point wasn't government revenue, but to eliminate the incentive for execs ransacking the company.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

90% for anything over $500K. That's the 1%.

[–] zappy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The cannabis industry has been hampered by a lack of demand...

What? That I do not believe

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Relative to the supply. We smoke a lot of weed as a country, but we also produce a whole lot and export destinations are limited.

[–] zappy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone rushing to over-supply the market was not a lack of demand. Legal weed is probably the largest new market in the last 5 years! Saying the company is underperforming because of a lack of demand when people are buying from other companies is such a hollow excuse.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

They're over producing because there are way too many producers, each trying to survive longer than all the other speculators. The solution is for most of them to go broke. Yay, free market.