this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
125 points (94.3% liked)

Privacy

31974 readers
425 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

First, it's not a TickTok ban. It's a ByteDance ban. ByteDance could sell TickTok to another company outside China and TickTock would be fine in the US.

Second, it was never about protecting user data. It was about preventing China from tweaking the algorithm to try to subtly influence public political opinion, instead of maximizing generic rage and political polarization, to exploit for ad dollars.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yet nobody cares about US companies like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube manipulating public opinion with their algorithms.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 5 points 2 months ago
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Plenty of people care, just not enough

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This isnt the point.

An adverserial nation shouldnt be able to influence public opinion like that.

We all understand that those companies do nefarious things. Imo its quite a bit different when its a whole ass country purposefully manipulating public opinion and they dont like the united states.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I get it, i don't want to live in China but i don't want to live in whatever Elon Musk has planned for the US, either, and his wealth gives him undue influence over... pretty much everything. You're not convincing me you've got a consistent take here if you're cool with Twitter but not TikTok.

[–] Steve 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nobody cares because they are US companies.

[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Seems bizarre that people are okay with public opinion being explicitly manipulated by a very small group of people with very little overlapping interest with the public, but not okay with public opinion being explicitly manipulated by a very small group of people with very little overlapping interest with the public from a foreign country.

[–] Steve 0 points 2 months ago

Not really. One can be dealt with if needs be, since they're US companies. The other can't because it's the Chinese government.

[–] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

You're exactly right on both counts. When you hear it from politicians, the sound bite (byte?) is "to protect the children" which is ambiguous. I take it to mean to protect the data of my children, somebody else takes it to mean to protect my children from being brainwashed and the children running the social media companies take it to mean it's protecting their right to wealth. It's win win win!

If the US govn't were serious about protecting people, they'd implement GDPR and put data privacy into the hands of the individual.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

First ban Discord or Instagram.

You know they won't cos they don't give a shit about our privacy, about us.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago

Don't ban anything. Pass legislation to protect data rights and make them all safe platforms.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Should ban data collection, even if it breaks the current e-commerce paradigm

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago

I don't see why that would break e-commerce at all. It would only make it better

[–] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

New idea for a web service: Give it the url of an article decrying the sorry state of corporate social media and hyping up some zany theoretical alternative that nobody's heard of, and it tells you whether or not the author gives any hint of having heard of the fediverse.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago

As I said last time this was shared, the article isn't really about TikTok - that is only used as a recent example of why these big proprietary datasets are problematic. The main point of the article is really to explain why we need an alternative and how it could work, using the example of Getgee. I wish more people would read past headlines, especially for interesting articles such as this one.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 months ago

Is this whole article literally just 1 sentence?!?

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

How about we just create some laws governing data collection and addictive behaviors? It shouldn't just apply to a few companies either it should be a simple policy that everyone must follow. It also needs to relatively easy to understand and clearly documented on how to be compliant

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

If you want to really make a change do not ban anything just stop advertise it and promote it. The people next will switch to privacy alternatives. It's not the TikTok fault it is the society fault. Meaning there is one solution and it's to change massively the society

[–] fart_pickle@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago