this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
87 points (89.2% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2842 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Aricle unavailable for legal reasons in the EU.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago
[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The legal reason being 'we can't be arsed to protect your data/are willing to sell it to the highest bidder'

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

the sooner elon ceases to exist the better

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The court’s order for an injunction applies only to the sections relating to defining and reporting data on content violation categories. Social media companies will still be under the remainder of AB 587’s requirements, which include semi-annually creating publicly viewable reports to California on the current terms of service, how automated systems enforce the terms of service, how companies respond to user-reported violations, and what actions the companies take against violators.

Seems like the higher courts ruling is sensible overall.