this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33670 readers
3421 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll go first. Mine is that I can't stand the Deadpool movies. They are self aware and self referential to an obnoxious degree. It's like being continually reminded that I am in a movie. I swear the success of that movie has directly lead to every blockbuster having to have a joke every 30 seconds

(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The original Blade Runner movie is not nearly as good as the sequel. The sequel highlights how lesser the original's plot was. We overly praise the first one because of the Tear in the Rain Speech.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Really? A lot of people seem to hate it for some reason...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Blade runner 2049 was a boring slideshow of backdrops with the "bwaaa" music overlaying it and occasionally plot happened. What plot is that? I don't fucking remember.

[–] FuglyTheBear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ill upvote you, because its an appropriatly unpopular opinion, but ill have you know I'm truly offended.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bogdugg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Gonna try to phrase this an inflammatory way:

People who like bad movies have been conditioned by consumerism to not appreciate art. They believe spectacle, humour, and a tight plot are 'good enough', and they don't value thoughtfulness, novelty, beauty, or abrasiveness nearly enough. Film is more than a way to fill time and have fun. Film is more than an explosion, a laugh, and a happy ending.

On an unrelated note: Mad Max: Fury Road is one of my favourite movies.

[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's strange that you said that and then said you liked fury road. I thought fury road was the epitome of spectacle and production value with actual value.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

What would you consider a "bad movie," because I wouldn't consider a "tight plot" one of their shared features. Spectacle: absolutely, humor: frequently, tight plot: if only.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Saving Private Ryan is a pro-war movie.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's pro war? To me it was the first depiction of the horrors of war. It made me think about my support for armed conflict and ultimately against it.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To me it was the first depiction of the horrors of war.

That doesn't necessarily make something pro or anti war.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To me, showing me something horrible is to be against it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I might just need to rewatch it because it's been 15 years, but I didn't care much for Citizen Kane.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Nobody actually enjoys watching Citizen Kane. It's the Wuthering Heights of the movie world: you get to feel pretentious and cultured for having checked it off your bucket list, but the actual experience was a total slog and you're probably never going to re-watch/read it ever again.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I like The Last Jedi.

That should be controversial enough.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not controversial. You like what you like.

Now, if you had said something like "The Last Jedi is a good movie." Well, that's demonstrably untrue.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah. Disagree. It is a good movie.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It LOOKS good, I'll give you that. The salt planet with the red soil was inspired.

It's too bad Rian Johnson didn't get an average 5th grader to proof read the script.

For example:

Leia and Rey have this touching scene where Leia gives her this tracking gem that will let her come back to the fleet no matter where they go.

Then, in the VERY SAME SCENE, the New Order pops out of hyperspace and another character says, out loud, "they tracked us through hyperspace???!? THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE!!!"

First - you literally just explained how yes, it was possible 2 sentences ago.

Second - Tracking devices have been a thing since the first Star Wars.

"TARKIN You're sure the homing beacon is secure aboard their ship? I'm taking an awful risk, Vader. This had better work."

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

91% of film critics agree it's a good movie. That's more than feel that way about Return of The Jedi. And way more than any of the prequels.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

91% of film critics didn't want to be on the wrong side of a rabid fanbase. ;)

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The rabbid die hard Star Wars fans are very loud about hating that film.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stamets@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No, I stand by the fact that it is a good movie. Just because it has some flaws doesn't make it universally bad. It's not even close to the worst movie in the franchise either. Rise of the Skywalker grabs that without hesitation (That outright is a TERRIBLE movie) but the Prequels are all significantly worse in both writing and direction than The Last Jedi. Revenge comes a lot closer and I'd say personally is tied with TLJ on coherence. George Lucas was a moron. He never had a plan but people constantly think he did. Within all three of the OT movies alone he keeps changing everything from characters to lore. The Prequels got worse because he had no one to temper him. That being said, this is about TLJ.

That being said, there's no issue with the writing there in my opinion. Leia and Rey do have a touching moment, sure, but that was in the Force Awakens not The Last Jedi. Leia also straight up never gives her that bracelet on screen because JJ Abraams is a complete and utter fuckwit. The scene in TLJ is between Finn and Leia where Leia reveals the beacon to Finn. He asks how Rey would find us and Leia and shows him. He says "A cloaked binary beacon." She says "To light her way home." You are right in that the scene does continue immediately into the First Order tracking them but how they tracked them was completely different. The beacon tells Rey (and only Rey) where Leia is when tracked. But Snokes vessel outright tracked them through lightspeed itself. They didn't check the location of her and then jump to her. They actively followed the fleet through hyperspace itself without needing end coordinates. This was shown later in the movie and Leia directly says it by saying "They tracked us through lightspeed.* Something that hasn't been shown to be possible on screen.

Yeah. They're in the same scene but that wasn't an accident. There wasn't people behind the scenes who were that monumentally braindead. That scene was written that way with the purpose of making people think that the two would be related. Now I will give you that it's not well written how they use that throughout the rest of the movie but it was put there on purpose. It was to make people doubt Leia (supporting him through the Poe arc, which worked way too well despite the fact that he did not have a singular leg to stand on with his entire argument despite everyone and their mother thinking he was right) and seem like the clear and obvious fix. They completely dropped the ball there, I admit. But overall I didn't have a problem with that scene specifically. Just how they used that scene. Especially considering that tracking device was never actually used. Seriously. They added in and then never really used it. I don't know if it ended up on the cutting room floor or what. The intention was clearly to fuck with the audience because Rey doesn't ever find the Resistance using that bracelet. She meets up with Kylo on Snokes ship and Kylo is the one who gives her the coordinates.

The logical writing progress would have been to have Finn doing his thing (that arc, I grant you, is fundamentally worthless. The whole casino segment is a waste of screentime and only manages to produce a couple of light gags which all focus on BB-8) and Poe advancing on Leias position during his mutiny. He gets to Leia and gets the bracelet, destroys it and they jump to lightspeed. Everyone breathes a sigh of relief and then the First Order shows back up anyway, having tracked them. Holdo has a scene of "I told you so", probably just by staring at him without saying anything, and then everyone freaks out on what to do. Leia is still out and Holdo is in command so she decides to try and ram them with the last lightspeed jump of the cruiser that they somehow manage to movie magic in the last second from all the X-wings, life support, yadda yadda. Forcing the rest to evacuate to Crait. Movie continues on as normal.

The issue to me isn't that the writing didn't make sense. It did. My issue was that they expected the audience to connect too many dots on their own. Ended up with people making different connections than were intended. Too many things were left on the cutting room floor while stuff like that Casino segment was allowed to go on for way too long. Or the kiss between Finn and Rose which was just fucking bizarre. So much so that even Finn in that scene has a look on his face like "What the fuck are you doing?" But with all the issues that TLJ has? I still find it to be a way more coherent story and more interesting one than either of the first two Prequels. And Rise of Skywalker because that movie is idiotic. Like a good script doctor could have fixed it and made it a decent movie but they made so many weird fucking decisions and bizarre writing choices that literally nothing about it makes sense. What pisses me off is people then blame Rian Johnson for the problems of Rise too when half of that was on the studio for not being able to make up their mind on directors/writers (that movie has way too many writers) and the other half falls squarely on the fanbase for reacting as strongly and negatively as they did to the first two sequels.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Best film from the 9. Has a very good story and leaves you wondering what is going on. It was exactly what it needed to be and did it in some new ways with older call backs. Seriously such a good flick.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think this is more popular than you think. Most serious SW fans appreciate Rian Johnson's attempt to take the franchise somewhere it had never been before, storytelling-wise, and the shitty retcon-fest that was ROS seems to have made it better by comparison. I've seen plenty of people online say it's the best aged film out of the sequel films.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Horror films are where art flourishes and it has a huge culture of being outside of Hollywood which is just a plus. Also the acting is usually way better

[–] XbSuper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Most horror movies have worse acting than a porno.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bestusername@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Can I do a TV show?... I'm gonna do a TV show.

The Mandalorian is boring!

They should have called it "Shiny Boba Fett and Baby Yoda travel planet to planet doing stuff".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Hobbit trilogy is just as good as Lord of the Rings and the CGI didn't ruin anything.

The Star Wars prequels are pretty good, and the Rey trilogy was excellent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ronflex@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The Exorcist (original) is one of the most boring horror movies I've ever personally sat through and I have no earthly idea why it caused such a stir at the time. Whole movie is a snooze fest until the last bit, but I found it less scary and more humorous.

[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The original Star Wars movies were probably really good and genre defining in the late 70s, but they're just boring and campy now.

[–] DLSantini@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The original Star wars trilogy was overrated, the sequels were underrated, and I'd rate them all to be equally mediocre.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›