this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
65 points (90.1% liked)

politics

18878 readers
3666 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was it an assassination attempt? Seems more like a concept of an attempt.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

More seriously, it smells an awful lot like a staged distraction strategy, considering the SCOTUS Robert’s memo broke literally hours prior, and also considering crazy distraction stories were a go-to strategy of the Trump admin

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But this guy hated trump? do you think this was a psyop like five years in the making? I mean, they can obviously try to get as much sympathy out of it as they can now and try to dominate the news cycle with it, but are we seriously suggesting this is some sort of conspiracy?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, we are seriously suggesting something like that.

You gotta realize that all these federalist society judges are coordinating WAY more than most people realize with the RNC and republican politicians. It’s a big club, and you (and I) ain’t in it.

Edit: Merp, I misinterpreted the context. You weren’t referring to Roberts.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

But how does this relate to Routh?

e: Agreed on SCOTUS corruption wholeheartedly

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm still VERY Confused why an American Holding a GUN is News?

The dude didn't even shoot. it doesn't even qualify for thoughts and prayers.

[–] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Well in Florida open Cary is illegal unless engaging in lawful hunting and fishing activities. Lots of little caveats like that all over the US

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The only part that shocks me, well, puzzles me really, is that the potential shooter knew where and when to be at the club when there was nothing on Trump's schedule saying he would be there.

It’s because every Sunday, he plays golf at whatever of his golf clubs is nearest to his last event. The secret service begged him not to do that.

When Obama played golf, he played on courses on military bases that are secure by design.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Trump is a creature of habits.

When he's at Mar-A-Shit-Go, he likes to go golfing at this particular golf course of his. So. it's only a matter of time before trump shows up at the golf course; which, all this guy would have had to do is, hang around and wait for it.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

attempts on presidents' lives are not rare in US history

And that's why the Secret Service is as comprehensive as it is. Ultimately, the democracy responds to problems.

The only thing shocking about it is that this shit didn't start sooner. Fuck, if I so much as flip the bird at the driver in the car next to me, there's a non-zero chance the response will be a bullet in my face.

If I directed the amount of hate and caused the amount of damage to the number of people that Trump has, I expect I'd look like Swiss cheese before I could do much as put the mic down.

People scoff at the secret service for a couple of supposed close calls, but the fact that this isn't happening on a weekly basis speaks volumes in support of their competence.

The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Conversation:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://theconversation.com/trumps-second-assassination-attempt-is-shocking-but-attempts-on-presidents-lives-are-not-rare-in-us-history-239263
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support