this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
187 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4879 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He's right, if the evidence was not legitimate, then Robinson would have a slam-dunk libel lawsuit worth millions. Like, it wouldn't even be hard to prove the evidence was faked. Just subpoena the logs from the servers and prove that the posts and comments were not legitimate. It would be easy and profitable, not to mention a huge victory that would clear his name and boost his profile right before the election.

Funny, it doesn't seem like he wants to go down that road. Because he knows the evidence is not manufactured, because he is a Nazi.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Meh, the enemy is using ai to spread their ideology and influence the election. It's time we adapted.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Uh… repubs are going to be manning the crematoria if trump wins. Why would we expect denunciations?

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 14 points 1 month ago
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They must be worried denouncing their friend the black nazi would make them appear racist. Bless them.

With the current state of the GOP, they're probably still trying to figure out whether their voters are more concerned by the "black" or the "nazi" part of his statement.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The bottom line here is simple. Six weeks to election day and we get a week to ten days of "Trump's handpicked NC candidate is a ginormous piece of hypocritical shit." So that rips another week and change off their campaign calndar to try to "attract" voters.

Then, five weeks before election day, Walz splatters Shady JD in a debate. So that rips another week off the calendar to try to regain the momentum and "attract" voters.

Of course by then Desperate Donald will have blurted 100 new horrific things and a hundred or more women will hve been murdered by GOP-Sharia-Trump Abortion Bans.

But OK it's what 15 October, three weeks to go. By then I guess Trump refuses to leave the golf cart and NoChance Vance has to campaign in PA, FL, and NC nonstop....

So no, Senators aren't going to say shit about Robinson. Trumps problem.

October 15 is later than it seems - Don't forget, early voting is already underway in some places and will be in full swing by then.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Sending Lindsey out again. lol.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Daily Beast:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-senators-struggle-to-defendbut-wont-denouncemark-robinson
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support