this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
307 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19091 readers
3395 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The mayor of a central Wisconsin city who ran for office on his opposition to absentee ballot drop boxes said Wednesday he did nothing wrong when he put on work gloves, donned a hard hat and used a dolly to cart away a drop box outside City Hall.

Wausau Mayor Doug Diny posed for a picture Sunday to memorialize his removal of the city’s lone drop box that had been put outside City Hall around the same time late last week that absentee ballots were sent to voters. The city’s election clerk, Kaitlyn Bernarde, said she has reported the issue to the Marathon County district attorney a well as the state elections commission.

“This is no different than the maintenance guy moving it out there,” Diny said Wednesday. “I’m a member of staff. There’s nothing nefarious going on here. I’m hoping for a good result.”

The move, which sparked a protest in the city Tuesday night and anger among drop box advocates, is the latest example in swing state Wisconsin of the fight over whether communities will allow absentee ballot drop boxes.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 104 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's the whole goal this election. The conservatives are going to interfere with the election in as many places as they possibly can. All of the chaos they create they'll then leverage to refuse to certify the election, then they'll move proceed with a contigent election because the chaos they've created means we don't have enough actual electoral votes to complete the election, then they'll all vote Trump, and then someone who lost the electoral college and the popular vote will have stolen the election.

We're absolutely fucked.

EDIT: I wonder if it's possible for the current administration to do anything to impact this potential. You'd think the American people would support an executive order blocking contingent elections as it robs them of their vote. Short of something like that happening, I'm terrified that there's nothing that can be done to stop them.

Do you think it would help or hurt the situation if Biden were to make a state of the union address and call out the imminent threat of Republican-led chaos causing this situation? Would shedding bright light publicly on it cause the people responsible to scurry away like the cockroaches they are?

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 101 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Putting aside the obvious concerns, a mayor doing this and using "it's the same as the maintenance guy" should be a red flag.

I've worked in companies where high-level people take it upon themselves to do operational work. It's at best pointless retail poltics, and at worst it's rampant bikeshedding.

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Correct its not his job and at best case scenario it's introducing an appearance of impropriety.

Even if he isn't trying to influence national or state elections, he still has plenty of motive to influence local politics.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 18 points 1 month ago

Mayor: [shoots some black guy] "What? It's the same as the cops."

[–] nemonic187@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol. This guy put on a hard hat to move an empty box with a dolly. That’s a flag right there that the guy has never done any kind of hard physical labor in his life. Charge his ass with felony election interference and fire his ass.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 64 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

“This is no different than the maintenance guy moving it out there….”

Except…

  1. If the maintenance guy is union, he’s doing union work in contravention of union agreements
  2. moving something out because of a state law is different than moving something away in contravention of said state law
  3. the maintenance guy wouldn’t make it a press opportunity and dress up like a construction worker
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The mayor is wearing a hardhat and loafers. Clearly needs training on appropriate ppe.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 month ago

"I think mail in ballots aren't secure, so I'm taking away the boxes that are a more secure option than the mail." Their excuses for election interference make them look like idiots but the media is happy to go along with it.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Look at this wet napkin:

These are the people that demand their ideals be followed:

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Republican official determined to make voting harder in Republican dominated community, not going to let facts or laws get in his way.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

We should have special drop boxes that sock you in your stupid face if you try to fuck with democracy in the land of the free.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

So? Because the box was now tampered with, what happens to the contents