this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
992 points (98.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20986 readers
1765 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 236 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    I've never had any trouble running adobe software on Linux.

    I've also never tried, but still the statement is technically correct.

    [–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

    I'm laughing way too hard at this.

    Honestly this is the best answer.

    Like, use the tools that work for your use case?

    I fucking hate macs but man using a video editor on windows was a pain back in the day. Where I would rather set up a server on Linux, than use whatever the hell windows servers operate.

    [–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 162 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

    The answer is very much "Don't run Photoshop"

    (Fuck Adobe. There, I said it)

    [–] Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    "It is always ethical to pirate adobe"

    [–] grue@lemmy.world 68 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

    It's never unethical to pirate Adobe, but it's always more ethical to use Free Software instead and deny Adobe the mindshare.

    [–] Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

    It's far more ethical to make the company lose money

    Minimum amount for photoshop is 22$/month

    Pirate photoshop

    Delete it

    Pirate again

    Repeat 30 times

    Adobe looses 660$

    If everyone does this adobe will loose so much

    [–] kautau@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

    Investors hate this one glitch!

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

    They don't care as they have a massive profit margin. What matters more is the market share. You got to break the standard way of thinking industry wide.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
    load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 126 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    What? This is a normal headphone dongle for macs.

    [–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago

    Don't be ridiculous, mac users have neat and tidy usb hubs. iPhone users on the other hand...

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] savvywolf@pawb.social 89 points 2 weeks ago

    I was taking to my sister, who is an artist, about setting up Linux and warned them about poor Adobe support. Their response was "⭐ 𝒻𝓊𝒸𝓀 𝒶𝒹𝑜𝒷𝑒 ⭐" due to their AI shenanigans and high costs.

    So thanks modern Adobe for making it easier for people to switch to Linux.

    [–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Are you trying to use a guitar as an input device for PhotoShop?

    [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    ???

    What else would you use?

    [–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Reverse polarity positron emitter.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 9 points 2 weeks ago

    Are you criticizing my MIDI art?

    [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    *Audiophile screeching in the distance as you enjoy perfectly fine 48k through this bad boy

    [–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

    I was hoping I could plug it into my guitar & watch the sounds on an old computer monitor…

    load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

    Say what you will, this is an efficient and elegant way to store your adapters. I’m envious.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)
    load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] harmsy@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    There are Linux users trying to use Photoshop?

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

    As a challenge... for science 👀...

    [–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 27 points 2 weeks ago

    I just went through this last night....VMware workstation +windows 10 + passthrough.

    [–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

    Photoshop cs2 is ~~free to download~~ and probably works well on wine as its old as hell.

    Edit: Correction. You used to o be able to download cs2 from adobe website. This is no longer the case.

    GIMP has always been able to do what I needed more or less. Its got a learning curve and sometimes I still dont 100% how something works but for basic photo editing, meme making, and converting photos to different file types (why is .webp not universally supported yet?) Its pretty good.

    When theres a problem doing something in GIMP it always felt like the issue was my own understanding of the toolset conbined with not-great documentation being given. I never felt like I encountered the limits of the program itself.

    I'm sure if you are a professional graphics person who needs advanced tools theres things only PS can provide and its user interface is probably more friendly. But for me, the average joe schmo, GIMP gets the job done 95% of the time with little to no headache.

    [–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

    Some people do overestimate how much of the software they’re actually using, and how far back some features go. I learned the little PS I know using a 7.0 license my father bought, I used it for years doing 2D graphics and web “design”, and still basically still have the same workflow with minor differences to avoid destructive changes.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] JoShmoe@ani.social 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    I don’t use Adobe, I make money just fine without it.

    [–] adam_y@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    It's hard to make money from Adobe when they charge you £66 a month.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 21 points 2 weeks ago

    Not too hard with WinApps. I just use GIMP.

    [–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

    You can skip 3 of these adapters if you upgrade to the latest libraries, downgrade your microcode, turn off WiFi, and bench press a goat. It turns out it was the goat involved I'm the process, rather than the sacrifice, that made that stuff work.

    [–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

    Love the rs232 to scsi adapter that thing is dope.

    [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 2 weeks ago

    What's so funny? This is how we played multiplayer Doom in 94.

    [–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
    [–] passepartout@feddit.org 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Krita is a different kind of tool used for drawing, but still really good. I don't even know the adobe way to do this lol.

    Gimp would be image post processing software like photoshop is. Also Inkscape is a vector graphics software like adobe illustrator.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    "This is what me and the boys biologically did you your mom last night"

    [–] Brutticus@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    You daisy chain your dicks in the others ass in descending order of size until the smallest one fucks her?

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] WereCat@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Or just use Photopea like a non-self abusive person

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

    Add one more adapter to plug that 1/4" into a sound card, plug a printer into the other end, and then hire Abdul Alhazred to write a Cups driver.

    [–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    back in the 90s piggybacking peripherals was a common way to upgrade your machine

    load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] tee9000@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Gimp sucks.

    And ps works with wine if you have it on windows already and drag over some system32 dlls

    [–] parpol@programming.dev 16 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    Gimp used to suck. Gimp 3 is amazing. Krita is great. Inkscape is OK.

    Having all three requires less space than Photoshop and Illustrator and covers about every feature of both.

    load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] art@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Gimp doesn't suck as an image editor, it just sucks as a Photoshop clone, which it was never meant to be. It's an amazing image editor.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›