this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
1010 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

4206 readers
856 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lohky@lemmy.world 266 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's not weird. That's how functional societies reconcile when they aren't subjected to endless propaganda and fear mongering.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 80 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, it is weird in the sense that it is unusual. But that doesn't make it bad, in fact it should become more normal.

[–] valek879@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago

I'd go so far as to say it's bad that it is unusual

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

i came to say this. being friends is healthy and normal.

[–] lohky@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm just so fuckin burnt out on xenophobia and i feel like that shit got pushed on me a lot growing up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 156 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I still don't think the natives got the good deal here

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Who's to say?

I was going to joke about an Amish casino, but then I remembered the move Kingpin

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 148 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Migration leading to mixed cultures instead of genocide and colonization. Americans: "This is so weird!"

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 1 week ago

“In this here melting pot, we burn away all our differences until we’re left with only the pure white flame of Christian nationalism.”

I had to put the statement in quotes because while being hyperbole, it’s not too far from how some people think, and I don’t want to be confused with those folks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 107 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That actually sounds awesome

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

The true American dream

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Need photos this sounds adorable

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

This post has been up an hour and we have no fucking information this is unacceptable.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't think jewelry wearing is compatible with the Amish conception of propriety and modesty but I'm not going to say it wouldn't happen.

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago (4 children)

My grandpa rents some of his fields out to an amish guy who also rents a lot of other fields in the area. The amish in our area are known to be pretty loose with their rules so my grandpa wasn't surprised when the guy showed up with combine harvester but he was kind of surprised with how new it was. My grandpa asked him how he could drive a combine when they weren't allowed to drive cars. To which the amish guy responded, "Well, I don't actually drive the combine; it drives itself. I just sit in it."

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like the Amish would be ok with a robotic vacuum as long as it charged itself from a solar panel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PoTayToes@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Jewish people on Sabbat vibes.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Most based Amish dude I've ever heard about.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

Good for them. Culture should evolve.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The "rules" the Amish live by are determined by the Elders of that group. They can be quite strict or fairly loose. And can vary by a fair bit from colony to colony even as neighbors. Cell phones can be fine for one group and be forbidden for the next.

Like some much in life, the rules are open to interpretation.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I saw some Amish or similar community teens freaking out in a Sheetz over the touch screens. They were having so much fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Maybe it depends on the branch of Amish. I’ve heard the ones in the Midwest are a little more relaxed than the ones in Pennsylvania.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone's just making shit up based on their feelings anyway, let them do as they ~~wilt~~ will.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really depends on the community, some have cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (8 children)

That's not weird, that's how things should be. Working together.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ntma@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago

anon discovers cultural exchange

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago (11 children)

What's weird is saying "native" and "indian" interchangeably in 2024.

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 94 points 1 week ago (4 children)

My native american father in law prefers to call himself an Indian.

From his point of view he wouldn't call himself a "native american" because he belongs to an actual nation and indigenous people aren't a homogenous group.

He prefers Indian because it makes white people look bad. Incredibly based

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 week ago

He prefers Indian because it makes white people look bad.

I know nothing else about him, but I like him already.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A sentiment I've heard a bunch is "oh, so you called us Indians and now you're uncomfortable with that label? Well fuck you, you don't get to keep unilaterally changing what's acceptable. If thinking about colonialism makes you uncomfortable, then great! Start sitting with that discomfort and recognising the crumb of self determination that we express by identifying as Indians. You gave us that label, and it's ours now."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Me, Native American (heh): Indigenous to where? lmfao

Indigenous [Continent/general area here] would be the closest all-round. Indigenous North American just too many syllables though. Trying to fucking get away from the fucking whirlwind of every 10 years Anishinaabe, Algonquin, Ojibwe, Chippewa, Native American, Indian, Injun shit please. The fewer syllables the better, and nothing people already have please. And no stupid fucking people first word semantics dumb shit when you're literally using the same words but it's better in THIS order not the other...

I swear people just pick the worst words to describe people sometimes when going down the slippery slope for PC language. It's all so arbitrary lol.

People first language literally creates more in-groups and out-groups who have to jump literal semantic hoops, usually just to make the in group feel a little better labeling someone because people turn a blind eye to racists.

I have rarely, and I mean very, very rarely seen new language originate from minority or out-groups being used by their own people first then co-opted by the in-group. There's some random language here and there, but anything race/ethnicity related, it's almost always the in-group getting too racist to call people by what they used for the out-group before, and they have to start calling them something else or fear being branded a racist... Rather than, you know, ostracizing people for being fucking racist.

Maybe I'm just too mixed or too ND to care, but for the same reason why if you get the pronunciation of my name close enough and know you're referring to me.

TBH, I wish Injun made a comebock.

I like Namen/Nnamen. (Native North American, human, man, woman, his noodly appendage) too. No, I don't care if you say Nay-men or Nah-men.

You're wrong if you pronounce GIF as JIF though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] azi@mander.xyz 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

'Indian' is still pretty widespread in the US

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Indian isn't offensive to native Americans in general

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It’s still technically called Indian Country and there are a variety of Indian services type organizations in the government.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm falling into the old person category lately but prefer to stay in the know. What is the proper nomenclature in 2024?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Indigenous" seems to be acceptable most people. When you know them personally, use their nation or tribal affiliation. Like if your friend was Korean, and you only referred to them as "Asian," it might feel like you don't care about the difference.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gbuttersnaps@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Different people prefer different nomenclature, but the generally accepted standard has switched from native American a couple decades ago to American Indian now. IIRC the change happened because calling people natives sometimes seems synonymous with calling them primitive. Most US tribal groups use American Indian now

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is part of the agreement to trade fashion accessories?

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

isn’t that a part of every agreement

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

As a father who raised 4 daughters, you try and stop a young woman from wearing jewelry, perfumes, and even makeup. That's a fight you WILL lose every time.

You should see the dating scene. A young Amish boy holding hands with a young Native walking down a hallway, (or vice versa). It ain't right I tell you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago

Yes but only among girls.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

This is local politics in action. In a federation this is protected. In a federation this could also be forced on all federated states or banned. In a federal system it is also allowed that damaging actions are outlawed or embraced and cherished by the state. It is all imperfect but the entire idea is the hope that all the various levels of legal authority check and balance themselves for the benefit of the people and are accountable to wrote law.

I am just writing this for people to maybe remember that this is how a federation (see: The United States of America) is fundamentally supposed to function.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Weird, but hey they ain't hurting nobody, so meh

load more comments
view more: next ›