this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
369 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4781 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 175 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Is there anybody here who's going to vote for lyin' Kamala?" Trump asked his rally attendees. "Actually, I should say don't raise your hand, it would be very dangerous. We don't want to see anybody get hurt. Please don't raise your hand."

Trump is fully aware that his supporters will engage in political violence, and that what he says (or refuses to say) has an impact on said violence. DoJ, take note for when he encourages another mob to engage in violence on his behalf and then acts like he wasn't doing exactly that.

Edit: In case I wasn't perfectly clear, this statement by Trump is admissible evidence that Trump knows that his speech is capable of encouraging violence, even something as otherwise harmless as "Is there anybody here who's going to vote for lyin' Kamala?"

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'll be at my local polling place with my concealed Colt .45, with my AR in the truck.

Let the red hats fuck around.

Libs: Time to stop pointing fingers and clutching pearls. Be there! It will be wild!

(I'm no badass, but I'm experienced, know the local laws and can shoot quite well enough. And I will be scared shitless, but I'll have some up-close conversations with anyone seeming to intimidate voters.)

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please don't pull a Rittenhouse.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Not possible. Liberals and dems always face punishment while Republicans violate every rule and law

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Be careful about that. It’s not legal to conceal carry at a polling place in Florida even with a CCW. I’m not sure where you are but the gun laws in FL are relatively lax; so just double check before.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

Hell yeah. I'm in. I'm breaking out my gun and gonna march my ass proudly confidently all the way down to my mailbox on October 20th or so. Unless it's raining. Then like. Maybe the next day.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

"Is there anybody here who's going to vote for lyin' Kamala?" Trump asked his rally attendees. "Actually, I should say don't raise your hand, it would be very dangerous.

They're at a Trump rally, of course they're all going to vote for Trump. The only reason to tell the non-existent people not to raise their hand is to normalize violence against the opposition.

[–] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 97 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Where’s our law enforcement in all this?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 114 points 1 week ago

They'll be doing the hurting

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why don't you ever see Batman beating up Bruce Wayne?

[–] tryitout@infosec.pub 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Split personality Batman who hates the rich would be amazing.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago

The first rule of fight club...

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

“Some of those that burn crosses”

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Cheering him on

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

Who do you think he's talking to?

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Cheering in the crowd

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, Merrick is busy trying to get Trump re-elected for his Federalist society masters, you know… for tax cuts.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Garland hasn’t been perfect on this but for quite a while it’s been the judiciary that’s been failing us.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Stochastic Terrorism:

Stochastic terrorism is a form of political violence instigated by hostile public rhetoric directed at a group or an individual.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

You dropped the asterisk.

*Except when Donald Trump does it. Then it's totes cool and legal.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A convict should watch his language regarding a former prosecutor. He hasn't been sentenced yet.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Consequences when?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"Is there anybody here who's going to vote for lyin' Kamala?" Trump asked his rally attendees. "Actually, I should say don't raise your hand, it would be very dangerous. We don't want to see anybody get hurt. Please don't raise your hand."

I wonder if he goes full mask off if he'll lose any voters.

(I think he has already, but some people just never see things until it hits them in the face.)

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He is definitely losing supporters. I know a postal carrier in one of the worst red states and after both recent debates she's been seeing longstanding trump flags and bumper stickers disappear from houses on her route.

[–] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That’s great and all, but someone taking down a sign doesn’t mean they’re not gonna vote for him. Now they can just do it without announcing it to the world.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it means there's a least a modicum of self awareness that has formed. It's a crack in the conservative brainwashing armor. They at least know they need to hide it.

You're not going to peel off most or even many of them, but all we need is them to say "meh, I'll just go do X instead of voting for Trump on Tuesday".

The margins are slim enough to make a difference.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They are aware there is an "after" they need to be at least thinking about.

Same. Of the dozens I've seen taken down, about ⅓ to ½ have been replaced with Harris signs. It's certainly been a surprise.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

It's not like he previously told his cultists repeatedly to attack people at his rallies and he'll pay their legal bills, whoops wait a minute...

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-incitement-violence/

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Jaysus Keerist lookit that frickin mug.

Goddamn.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 10 points 1 week ago

That picture of Trump is the most terrifying I’ve seen of him ever.

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

lol kinda off topic but holy shit they could not have more pointedly made an unflattering comparison in those side by side photos if they tried the rest of their lives. Hilarious.