this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
196 points (96.2% liked)

News

23296 readers
3174 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 152 points 1 year ago (2 children)

individuals pointed to a major event, like the death of a spouse or a medical emergency, as the trigger.

Gee, if only we had a healthcare system that wasn't solely focused on making a profit and growing the amount of profit quarter after quarter.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not just that, it's Boomers as a generation not saving.

Obviously some did, but most have lived their entire lives paycheck to paycheck and have zero security net. It's why they're not retiring like other generations, it's not a choice, they just can't ever stop working.

And they can't recover from any speed bumps they hit. Losing a spouse for those people also means losing an income. And that can mean losing housing.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What is it that half the boomer threads complain that boomers are hoarding all the money in their 401Ks, and the other half say that boomers didn't save anything?

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because there was a fair portion of the boomer gen that inherited wads of cash and housing from their parents.

The rest of us were disowned, worked low-paying jobs and/or tried to help our kids do better than we did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Because only a few of the boomers became ceos, the rest are just "useful idiots" that vote against their own best interests.

A significant amount never planned to retire or else thought OASDI would be all they'd need. By the time they realized they were fucked, it was too late.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 6 points 1 year ago

Because sample size of n = 1

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 year ago

Honestly. Medical bills are the number one cause for bankruptcy in the US

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 148 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So nobody gives a shit that the younger generations can't afford a house, but it's "unconscionable" when boomers can't?

[–] willis936@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

You don't earn the title "Me" generation without being legendarily self important.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was my first thought, homelessness has risen all across the board, especially among children, but boomers are still made the focus.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly, maybe this is an effective strategy. Rather than continue to try to convince them to care about others, we just have to convince them that they are in danger themselves. Republicans discovered that fear motivates boomers better than avocado motivates millennials, so it’s time to start using the tools we have available to drive the point home.

And then we can finally get our hands on all that sweet avocado and toast…

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

"Well, well, well...if it isn't the consequences of my actions"

[–] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The young people who can't BUY a house still have housing. This is about unhoused people who are in a decidedly worse position.

[–] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I don't know what's it's like where you are, but there are definitely also a lot of young homeless people where I live. I don't just mean house-less, I mean living in tents or worse.

It really sucks that so many people are suffering, and there isn't even a good reason for it.

You can work your arse off day in, day out, only to get hit by someone driving drunk. Then, you get stuck on insufficient disability payments, even through you had no fault in what happened to you. Even if you manage get a decent court payout in a good country, you're still probably looking at a lot of expenses accessibility-wise (ESPECIALLY if you live somewhere like the US.) A lot of that stuff isn't cheap. Plus, you would have to try to make that payment last for the rest of your life. Food, bills, rent, clothing, and more would all still be costs you would have.

It sucks that so many people push back against any kind of support for these individuals. It really makes you wonder what they would do if they woke up with the shoe on the other foot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 76 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Boomer retirement plans and savings aren't enough? Sheesh what hope do any of us have, then? They are the wealthiest generation this country has ever seen..

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they should stop buying lattes and avocado toast 😉 something...something..boot straps

[–] victron@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe boomers (or anyone) shouldn't live for too long /s

[–] ClumZy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Drop the /s. There's 8 billions of us out there, this discussion will arise sooner or later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Have you seen the size of the average American home?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How did these boomers vote?

What policies did they support for their entire lives that have impacted this?

[–] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not every boomer supported the GOP or Reagan.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

An awful lot of them did, though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

For every hippy progressive, there were at least 5 Leave it to Beavers ready to take up the conservative mantle. Sure, not every Boomer supported the GOP, but a ton definitely did.

[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There were actually no homeless Boomers during the great depression.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's why the numbers haven't been seen before.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hey this is what they wanted, right? Pull yourselves up by your bootstraps, ya chucklefucks! Stop buying all that diabetic medicine and eating out at Bob Evans every day!

Let's see how many of those same boomers still blame everyone else, including liberals, for how their life is ending up and continue voting for the same party that stripped them of the social safetynets and policies that may have helped them out in a situation like this.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Implying that Boomers only vote Republican is reductionist and unproductive. They vote proportionately similar to the rest of the country. There's just THAT many retards across all age groups, including Gen Z, in America that vote against their economic interests.

[–] i_am@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not disagreeing that retards exist in all age groups but saying Boomers vote proportionally similar to the rest of the country isn't accurate either.

Ages 18-29 voted 60% for Biden and 36% for Trump. Ages 65 and older voted 45% for Biden and 52% for Trump.

https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-2020

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's why...

...They all have been voting republican since Reagan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wooshock@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe I'm dumb for not lumping an entire generation of people into this huge group of bad actors who intentionally and maliciously hurt all subsequent generations.

The issue is money. What part of "people don't have money" is so hard to digest?

The disparity has become much much wider over the years, and that is the issue.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The ones hording wealth and property are not the ones going homeless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TFW you live through one of the most prosperous times in the most prosperous nation in the world (a time when you could go to college, buy a house, and have a family on a job that anyone could apply to) and you STILL end up poor. Talk about dumb.

[–] wombatula@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's because as conditions changed, they never lost that mentality.

My boomer parents make twice the food they need to eat for dinner every single time and then just throw out or freeze and forget the leftovers, they could literally cut their food budgets in half just by being more reasonable with their portion sizes.

They have coffee at home and a nice coffeemaker, they go out for coffee almost every day driving a round trip of ~50km for the exact same brand of coffee they have at home, and when I mentioned this to them the last time they were having financial problems they said something to the effect of "oh well it's only a few dollars each" not even understanding that the gas they use and the wear they put on their vehicles is part of it too, and maybe it only costs a few dollars (plus gas etc) that when you do it every day it adds up.

It's literally the same as talking to my preteen nieces and nephews, they just have no concept of the value of a dollar, and are completely unwilling to change a single aspect of their lives to save money, and then get confused as to how they keep running out of money before the end of the month. I know that sooner or later I am going to have to take them in, or put them in a home, because they can't even manage their own finances and get angry and defensive any time I try to make suggestions to help them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shartworx@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Is this why grandma has an OnlyFans?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Oh this is the perfect thread for a trickle down economics joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DonJefe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is terrible, and nobody deserves this. As a millennial that has ben constantly screwed by boomers and their collective decisions, I can't help but to think that "you rip what you saw. Maybe they should try to make the coffee at home to save money, instead of going to Starbucks. Also, they'll be fine if they stop eating so many expensive avocados."

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you rip what you saw

reap, you reap what you sow, because if you sow wheat on fertile ground, you can later reap wheat.

[–] hooferboof@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

rip what you saw kinda works if you're talking about ripping plywood 😁

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Live by the sword. Die by the sword I guess.

[–] Jeanschyso@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I feel like the United States' fixation on limiting taxes and government intervention is something the rest of the world has been trying to warn about.

This seems to me like the second biggest example of "fuck around and find out" to come out of the US in a long time.

theres no profit incentive, of course these useless bags of flesh deserve to be put on the streets. welcome to america!

[–] misanthropy@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sparks joy. Welcome to the party you created.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

I agree and understand however the ones going homeless were most likely victimized by the ones who created this situation in their peer group

[–] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

"The dildo of consequence rarely arrives lubed"

However, my Bugles are always lubed by my frothing salivating mouth. I'm a bit hungry and getting weird, sorry you had to read that.

load more comments
view more: next ›