In the most crucial 4 years of our Republic, after having successfully deposed it's greatest threat, Merrick Garland has got to be the most ineffectual, lazy, and cowardly Attorney General we've ever had.
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
213 points (99.5% liked)
politics
19091 readers
3395 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Republicans got exactly who they wanted. :/
They scared the fuck out of him, and Joe allowed him to stay scared, one of the greatest, if not the greatest failure of the Biden presidency
They "warned him" with a letter...
Moderates aren't enough to fight fascism, they won't put the effort in because they're more concerned with stopping progressives.
If we got rid of the fascists, there wouldn't be a reason to hold our nose and vote for a moderate.
It's ridiculous. I've seen all these political/legal pundits coming out saying "It's probably not going to go to court, but it toes the line!"
No, fuck that. If you promise someone money, or even the chance of money, to vote or pledge support for a candidate, that's compromising the democratic process. And if that's somehow not illegal, it should be made illegal without question.
They're basically saying "Hey, you can stand outside polling stations and offer free scratch tickets to people who take a picture of their vote for Trump, and that's not illegal because it's not a guarantee of reward."
Not to mention this is essentially the same line of reasoning Repubs keep using to make voting worse for everyone. Can't give out water in line to vote because you might be "buying votes", so you gotta wait in line 6 hours in the hot sun if you're in a poor district.
But hey, totally cool when it's ol Musky doin it for cash not for health!
The problem is that it's the FEC who's responsible, and they're constantly deadlocked at 3-3 which renders them toothless in terms of enforcement.
(The way I'd fix this is to have a new law passed allowing a "President's representative" who the President appoints to the FEC - without need for confirmation - as the 7th member, and who automatically resigns when the President leaves office. This 7th member can break the deadlock.)
Anyways, it seems like Musk has no way to verify that the winners are actually going to vote Red. Here's hoping that the vast majority that he gets signed up end up turning out for Harris instead.
Guys, relax! It's OK. He's a rich conservative. He's allowed to break the law.
He's a rich conservative. He doesn't have laws.
Ftfy
Guessing he won’t be prosecuted because iT WouLd bE DiViSiVE
Justice system: But he has money, sooo......shrugs
So, it's not unusual for the DOJ to send a warning letter. Kind of a "we are watching you" situation. If Elmer proceeds the ownership is solely his.
Hasen first covered the issue on his blog last Saturday, where he cited 52 U.S.C. 10307(c), the federal law that prohibits paying someone or accepting payment “either for registration to vote or for voting.” The penalty is $10,000 or up to five years in prison or both.
i wonder which of those penalties he’ll be getting
$10k, which SCROTUS will overturn saying that DoJ owes him $10M for wasting his time. Assuming he doesn't just get pardoned.
are the people taking money from him breaking the law, as well ?
Yes. According to user @affiliate@lemmy.world:
Hasen first covered the issue on his blog last Saturday, where he cited 52 U.S.C. 10307(c), the federal law that prohibits paying someone or accepting payment “either for registration to vote or for voting.” The penalty is $10,000 or up to five years in prison or both.
New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for New York Times:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/10/15/opinion/thepoint#musk-breaking-voting-law