this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
429 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

You can get thin clients for much less than that... Better performance if needed, similar power efficiency for similar loads, they sometimes bring storage, power supply and ram and you don't generate more e-waste as these are already being thrown out by many big companies every few years.

The only reason to go for the PI is if you really need the GPIO, the tiny form-factor and even then there are cheaper alternatives with similar or better spevs.

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's all about the idle power and software support.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

🌈 The software support! 🌈

Anything that runs on an SBC has a Pi image. Download, write, go. And Pi OS (Debian) for anything else. Or Ubuntu LTS.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Thin clients are just regular x86 boxes, they're miles ahead of every SBC. The only downsides for consumers are slightly bulkier sizes, slightly higher power draw and of course the gpio/Hat ecosystem is not available, but I would argue that for most people that's not really relevant.

[–] somenonewho@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. As someone running a NAS/Jellyfin server of a SBC/USB SSD I would love to pick up an x86 sffpc too properly put everything inside but idle power and quiet aren't easily beat.

Software support olinwouldnt really agree since x86 gives a lot more options than ARM

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

My RPi 3b pulls 5W, while my thin clients draw about 6-7W on idle, one of them doesn't even have a fan, the other one could easily be modded to lose the fan.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can get thin clients for much less than that…

Interesting, do you have examples?

[–] fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Not sure where you're from. But here is a random one from ebay . You will find many like it. I got this model with 4gb ram, 256 ssd and power supply for ~80€ on europe, much less then I could pay for any PI4 at the time that came with no case, no psu, no ssd. It idles around 3-4w headless with no peripherals running home assistant. There are other models too ofc. Just have a look around used hardware stores if you have them around your area.

[–] DopamineDaydreams@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Uhuh, for work we love raspberry PIs as they're small enough to stick behind a wall mounted TV and good enough to run our display apps. All for the low price of £80~. I'd love it if you have viable alternatives.

[–] fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

When I was looking for a pi4 I stumbled upon orange pi, rock pi, banana pi and libre computer. They have models both cheaper and more expensive than the rpi. All depends on the specs you need.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago
  • x86 compatibility if you go for the thin client over a pi
[–] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unobtainable and will be mostly sold to run advertising displays and business epos systems. Miss me with that shit.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Most places have preorders open, shipping in October, also Pi 4s are now back in stock in most shops.

[–] algorithmae@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole reason RaPi got so big was its price point, because it offered so much capability that was essentially disposable in case the worst happened to your project. As long as it costs more than $35 I will not be interested.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can always get the Pi Zero 2 W, which is still more capable than the orignal Pi was, and costs even less, even after all these years.

Or the 1 GB version of the Pi 4. For many projects, even that is overkill. Not everyone needs the stuff Pi 5 brings, like dual 4k60 monitors or the PCIe slot.

Just buy whatever your use case requires. The "zero" line has kind of filled that very low cost niche for now.

[–] dave@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m going to get back to watching that later.

[–] wagoner@infosec.pub 23 points 1 year ago

I appreciate you letting all of us know. I hope all is well with you and your family, and I look forward to your feedback when you return.

[–] Luke_Fartnocker@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you know when that will be?

[–] gentooer@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Stop attacking me!

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

What'd you have for lunch?

[–] bunnyfc@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can keep their overpriced surveillance ware and sell it to some police departments.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate on the surveillance part?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably riffing on the fact that the Pi people hired (some time ago) an ex-cop who had used their devices in surveillance.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but that rockchip stuff looks like fire

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did OP shout EVERYTHING? The original title doesn't have that clickbait formatting.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have an anti clickbait addon or something? For me it looks like this:

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, yes. That's it. I have the dearrow extension running. I apologize for my snark and direct it to the true OP from youtube.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No worries, maybe I should install that addon too ^^

It can really slow down pages loading on youtube, but it's worth it for me. This is what I show, it de-clickbaits the title and changes the clickbait thumbnail.