this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
239 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Future Motion, the maker of the Onewheel electric skateboard, is recalling every one of them, including 300,000 Onewheel self-balancing vehicles in the US. Alongside the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the company now seeks to remedy the products after four known death cases — three without a helmet — between 2019 and 2021.

The recall comes a year after Future Motion took issue with the CPSC’s calls for recall and claimed that it tested and found nothing wrong with the Onewheels. At the time, the company issued a press release in objection to the CPSC and called the agency’s statements “unjustified and alarmist.”

Now Future Motion is moving forward with a voluntary recall it chose not to do almost a year earlier. The company is asking owners to stop using their Onewheels until they take appropriate action. For the newer Onewheel GT, Onewheel Pint X, Onewheel Pint, and Onewheel Plus XR, a software update with a new warning system is the remedy.

For early adopters, however, the CPSC and Future Motion are telling owners to stop using and discard the original Onewheel and Onewheel Plus. We asked Onewheel chief evangelist Jack Mudd in an email how many of the original units are affected, but Mudd refused to answer. Mudd also wouldn’t tell us why the company claimed there were no issues and publicly resisted issuing a recall back in 2022.

Mudd did say that the software update for the other models is rolling out worldwide, not just in the US.

Some crashes occurred due to Onewheel skateboards malfunctioning after being pushed to certain limits. The Onewheel GT, Onewheel Pint X, Onewheel Pint, and Onewheel Plus XR will receive a firmware update that will add a new warning “Haptic Buzz” feedback that riders can feel and hear when the vehicle enters an error state, is low on battery, or is nearing its limits and needs to slow down.

“This update is the culmination of months of work with the CPSC,” reads the company’s recall website. Last November, it called the CPSC’s warning about Onewheels “misleading” but stated it would “work to enhance the CPSC’s understanding of self-balancing vehicle technology and seek to collaborate with the agency to enhance rider safety.”

To install the update, owners must connect their Onewheels to the accompanying app and run a firmware update — the process is fully explained in a new video.

For early adopters, however, owners can receive a “pro-rated credit of $100 to the purchase of a new board,” according to Mudd. The credit will only be issued after owners confirm that they have disposed of the old model.

Alongside Future Motion’s blink on the decision to recall Onewheel, the company shared a new video on YouTube highlighting the new Haptic Buzz feature as well as best practices when riding. “We’ve been working closely with the CPSC for over a year in order to develop this new safety feature,” Mudd says in the video. He adds that ignoring pushback or Haptic Buzz “can result in serious injury or death.” It took engineers a while to whip up Haptic Buzz; perhaps it’s something that would not have been ready in a timely fashion after CPSC’s first whistle last year.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] herr@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

All of these words yet not a single one mentions what exactly was faulty about the old software. Did it force-eject drivers after "certain limits" were "exceeded"?

[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago

The one wheel works by having the rider lean in a direction to go that way. The more you lean, the faster it goes. It balances by pushing the rider in that direction. The trick is when you are leaning and going very fast, but then the board loses power and can't push you anymore. Then the board nose dives and ejects you. Its the physics of the board, so they can warn you it might happen, but not prevent it.

[–] 30mag@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I hate articles like this.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Requiring disposal to get a measely $100 credit on an $1,400 to $2,200 board seems a little extreme. Full replacement? Yeah, require proof of disposal. $100? Stop using it and turn it into a museum piece or something.

[–] Maximilious@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was my thought too. Not knowing how much they cost and reading $100 I already knew that amount was way too low. I've gotten recalls on dehumidifiers in the past and the rebate usually equated to about half of a new unit. That's obviously apples to oranges but still a rediculous offering given the price of a newer model.

[–] Stabbitha@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

There's a fire hazard recall out on my table saw, $75 to send them a pic of it inoperable. Nah, I'll just keep a fire extinguisher nearby.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Given the company's history towards repairability, you shouldn't buy one in the first place. They're a future doorstop.

[–] Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

guess the cost of a recall and fix was cheaper than the cost of settlements

[–] kambusha@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago

His name is Robert Paulson

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Looking forward to the Louis Rossmann video on this

Edit: It's up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_Mk-5XkSmY

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

The fact people died on these before isnt news.. the recall and getting 100 bucks for it is news.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I can see his eye circles in my nightmares

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I went directly to YouTube to check of his video was up already.

It's going to be a blast

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

they had a crappy anti consumer business model anyway.

sad but not surprised they fucked up further.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now Future Motion is moving forward with a voluntary recall it chose not to do almost a year earlier

Since when could companies just chose when to recall their defective product?

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The government can compel product recalls, but must prove the product is defective. Companies can recall products voluntarily before that happens.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are they going to recall all of the clones that are out there, too? All of these one-wheel "hoverboards" are super dangerous and nobody seems to care.

It's not like a skateboard or bike, where propelling the vehicle is all controlled by your body, or easy to find controls on a bike. A electric scooter has controls on the handle. These hoverboards are controlled by merely standing on them, and it's way too easy to try to stand on it and immediately break a leg or arm as it flies off away from you. You can't just turn it on and off as you're trying to stand on it.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This recall seems to be in response to a software bug that causes it to spontaneously shut down, leading to a crash. Competing products probably don't have the same bug.

That's unrelated to any inherent risk in riding one. There is certainly inherent risk in riding an electric unicycle/skateboard hybrid, which is obvious to most people upon reading the phrase "electric unicycle/skateboard hybrid".

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The sudden stop issue has been known for as long as these things existed and it's taken until a bunch of people died for them to do anything about it.

[–] SineSwiper@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Getting on one of those things before you're ready is almost as bad as suddenly stopping. My wife broke her arm after trying to show my son how it works, and I know co-workers with similar stories, including head injuries.

Immediately took the damn thing back. This is just the 2020s version of lawn darts.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

They at least claim that the software "bug" they are fixing on the newer boards with the update is only to implement a (better?) warning system as the crashes happen when you push the board too hard and it can't keep up, causing it to nosedive or shut off completely due to overload. If you ride it sensibly, that shouldn't be an issue.

Asking people to scrap the old boards just because they cant get a warning system does kinda sound like there actually is some deeper issue they don't want to disclose though.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


At the time, the company issued a press release in objection to the CPSC and called the agency’s statements “unjustified and alarmist.”

Now Future Motion is moving forward with a voluntary recall it chose not to do almost a year earlier.

“This update is the culmination of months of work with the CPSC,” reads the company’s recall website.

For early adopters, however, owners can receive a “pro-rated credit of $100 to the purchase of a new board,” according to Mudd.

Alongside Future Motion’s blink on the decision to recall Onewheel, the company shared a new video on YouTube highlighting the new Haptic Buzz feature as well as best practices when riding.

“We’ve been working closely with the CPSC for over a year in order to develop this new safety feature,” Mudd says in the video.


The original article contains 536 words, the summary contains 135 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!