this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
168 points (100.0% liked)

News

23287 readers
4185 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
168
Big oil firms knew of dire effects of fossil fuels as early as 1950s, memos show (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Newly unearthed documents contain warning from head of Air Pollution Foundation, founded in 1953 by oil interests

Major oil companies, including Shell and precursors to energy giants Chevron, ExxonMobil and BP, were alerted about the planet-warming effects of fossil fuels as early as 1954, newly unearthed documents show.

The warning, from the head of an industry-created group known as the Air Pollution Foundation, was revealed by Climate Investigations Center and published Tuesday by the climate website DeSmog. It represents what may be the earliest instance of big oil being informed of the potentially dire consequences of its products.

"Every time there's a push for climate action, [we see] fossil fuel companies downplay and deny the harms of burning fossil fuels," said Rebecca John, a researcher at the Climate Investigations Center who uncovered the historic memos. "Now we have evidence they were doing this way back in the 50s during these really early attempts to crack down on sources of pollution."

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Of course they knew.

Scientists like Svante Arrhenius in the late 1800s first proposed the idea that increased carbon dioxide from human activities could cause warming through the greenhouse effect.

In 1958, Charles Keeling began recording continuous CO2 measurements at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, creating the "Keeling Curve" which provided definitive proof of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.

https://www.discover.ukri.org/a-brief-history-of-climate-change-discoveries/index.html

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In the 1990s, we all knew. And we had enough time and the technology to stop it.

That technology was nuclear, since solar and wind just weren't developed enough back then.

But we collectively decided that nuclear power was too risky, so now we are here today.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We didn't collectively decide anything lol. Hilarious you think thats how our society works.

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

Go around and ask people their thoughts on nuclear. The vast majority of people bought the anti nuclear propaganda and believe it to be extremely dangerous and expensive

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This doesn’t surprise me.. but it does make me wonder what kind of person would ignore that sort of data just for money..

I mean.. really, who in their right mind says “well this is going to be catastrophic, and we could shift gears now to prevent it and release all the data and be absolute heroes among men, but nah, we’d rather it burn.”?

Money is great and all (I guess), but when the global economy collapses due to the catastrophic climate change, it’s not going to be worth a whole lot..

[–] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

what kind of person

A billionaire. Especially an old billionaire, who doesn't give a shit about what happens to the planet because he won't see the consequences. A psychopath narcissist who doesn't care about anything except money - but I repeat myself.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Corporations always get in the mindset of, "Rake in the profits now and well deal with the consequences later." When the consequences are decades away, it never really becomes later to them. They just focus on the profits.