this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
328 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4013 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And so it begins...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 6 points 1 hour ago

George W. Bush made a joke about being a dictator, but never tried to actually be one. Trump has been trying to be a dictator from the moment he was born...

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't see him lasting his full term. Dude's old, is incredibly unhealthy, and has enough power-mad people around him that the first sign of weakness will probably be enough for medical intervention and Vance becoming president. Becoming president AGAIN at his age is possibly the dumbest thing he can do for his health.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

This is something I don't think they even acknowledge or think about. Some of their shit in comparing him to Hitler (and they do that in a positive manner) is when they claim that some of the shit that is happening to him is like him being imprisoned after the Beer Hall Putsch (referring to Jan 6th). This is stupid. Hitler was barely in his early 30s at the time and he was actually at the START of his political career. Trump was never imprisoned and when he did his shit he already had very real political power that Hitler never had in 1923.

Trump the oldest presidential nominee ever and I hope that he will stay the oldest. We don't need that kind of geriatic shit in any political office anywhere.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Long as his "forever" ends at or before 2027

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 30 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Let me get this right. So, you know exactly who this man is and what he stands for. Yet, you elect him anyway. You know he's been "joking" about this before. Yet, you elect him anyway. He's a convicted felon. Yet, you elect him anyway.

I've lost every smidgen of respect I had for Americans. You went into this with eyes wide open. You deserve what's coming.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

You deserve what’s coming.

You're talking to the people who tried to stop him, so fuck off.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I voted for Kamala, and got a handful of others to as well, don't include me with the rest of them. I don't deserve this.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 17 minutes ago

Yeah, not only did I vote against this, my demographic hit 94% for Harris.

Same. I voted on the first day of early voting, and convinced my nephew and his two best friends to cast their first (and likely last) votes. My niece is 15; I'm sure she'll be glad to hear she "deserves" what's coming.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 37 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, already in the first week. Expect to hear this joke periodically over the course of his term, each time getting slightly more seriously stated. By the third year, everyone will have heard it so much it'll be accepted as a perfectly reasonable idea. And the media will help that along in how they report on it. This is the tried and true playbook and it will work, not only for this plan but for their other plans.

Take for example the planned mass deportations. They'll start out with finding some people who have committed crimes (or they claim have), deport them and no one will object to that, it's already how it's done. As they move on to those whose crimes are not very consequential, like traffic tickets or whatever, if libs say anything against it, they'll pounce on it and amplify stories how the libs are overreacting and want criminals to be left free and have open borders. Harping on any criticism in cases that are technically justified is key to getting the public used to pooh-poohing any dissent as they start escalating and going after the law-abiding (other than being here illegally ofc) immigrants, families with mixed status members, DACA/Dreamers, parents of children born here and thus citizens and deporting the children with them, etc.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Ha such fun joke

Edit: also just boys being boys

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

He won't stay in power. His appointment of incompetent sycophants will dismantle 250 years of American prosperity (maliciously or negligently, it doesn't matter) and it will be sold for parts to billionaires and foreign states.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago

will dismantle 250 years of American prosperity

cough 1961 to 2008

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah; he’ll stay in power long enough for that.

But he’s 78 years old. When he’s supposed to step down in 2029, he’ll be almost 83.

The average life expectancy of men in the US is currently 73.

Based on historical data for people Trump’s age and health in the US, he’s likely to die of natural causes before he’s 86.

So the longest he could likely hang on for is one more term than he’s supposed to.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I bet he wants nepotism to for succession, but that's not what his benifactors want, hence JD Vance

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 44 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Remember, the Constitution is just a really old piece of paper if the people entrusted to enforce it choose to ignore it.

There is a non-zero chance that Trump could move to suspend the Constitution entirely, backed by a complicit Cabinet, Congress, Supreme Court and several state governments. And at that point, we would literally have to hope and pray that the rank-and-file military is on the side of the people, which is far, far from guaranteed. Because if they're not, you can claim your Constitutional rights all you want, but you'll be doing it with the other prisoners inside of whatever re-education camp you're assigned to.

Heck, there's a non-zero chance that the American voter just gives off a collective "meh" and just apathetically lets Trump seize total power. We just saw a few million people do just that.

[–] Bonifratz@lemm.ee 100 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

Luckily, the process of repealing or changing an amendment likely won’t change anytime soon, even with a Republican trifecta at the federal level, as it requires overwhelming public support. As outlined in Article 5 of the Constitution, any such change requires at least two-thirds of the Senate and the House to agree on the modification, with that change then requiring ratification by a minimum of three-quarters of states in the nation.

I wouldn't be so confident. If the majority decides to ignore it, then a constitution suddenly holds very little weight. Remember how the Roman Empire was once a Republic, until someone decided it wasn't anymore? Remember how 1930s Germany was a democracy, until someone decided that had to end?

Trump might argue some weird logic regarding the 22nd and 12th amendment. Or he might just declare a state of national emergency because of a new migrant caravan or some such shit, and postpone elections indefinitely. If he tries anything of the sort, it will all come down to whose side the military is on.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Burn the senate building, arrest some democrat kid and say there is a deep state satanic conspiracy with the democrats to destroy the God Appointed Trump Presidency, throw fake news all over the place and call for another election and/or emergency bill that gives him unlimited power.

What is that thing about story not repeating itself but rhyming?

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 40 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

What happens if they declare all democrats are enemies of the state and remove them from office and put their people in?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 hours ago

You mean the thing that they literally told us they were going to do?

They didn't actually mean that...

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 37 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, a "joke".

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 141 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tiita@lemmy.world 75 points 20 hours ago (11 children)

Not really.. This time America voted for the felon to become a dictator

And the felon will do whatever he can to make it happen.

Last time it was still a misguided presidency.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 73 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

I hear ya, but I mean he 'joked' about it before this election too.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

He’ll do what Putin did. Have Vance run as President, and run as his Vice-President. He’ll maintain control like Dick Cheney with Bush.

[–] firebyte@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Trump's malignant narcissism won't let him be subordinate to someone else. So that idea is out.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

That’s explicitly not allowed by the constitution. 12th amendment

[–] pornpornporn@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 4 hours ago

It's already established that the 14th amendment doesn't apply to him, so why would the 12th?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They. Do. Not. Care.

You still don't get this?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

The point is if they do not care, they wouldn't even bother to pretend. He'd just stay in office or run again.

The dance of running as VP doesn't make any sense as either they don't care and it's not necessary, or they do care and that's not a loophole that exists.

Besides, IIRC Kanye and Trump had a falling out over a suggestion that Trump would take a backseat to Kanye in a campaign. Trump won't settle for even the appearance of 'second place'.

[–] rimmedalpha@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 12 hours ago

Yes, but the 28th Amendment written on this McDonald's napkin says he can totally do this.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 75 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›