this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
42 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4712 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So tired of this one. One of the most populist things the Democrats could do, as a group, would be to run on ending the legal insider trading that all these fuckers do. Doing something like that would probably give them the House and the Senate if they actually ran on that, broadcast that, and then did something about it. That might be easier to do - if they could stop self-dealing.

Nancy is the face of this but it's not like it's only her or confined to Democrats.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

it's not like it's only her or confined to Democrats.

True. She just happens to be the very best at it, bar none.

She's less awful than most Republicans and a few of the Democrats in Washington in general, but when it comes to legal corruption, nobody's as prolific and skilled as Pelosi. No Democrats, no Republicans.

That's how she was elevated to leadership over 20 years ago without seniority and with no legislative accomplishments to speak of: nobody's as good at corralling and representing the owner donors as her.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 41 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

For fuck's sake! Go away and take Hillary with you!

And while you're at it, take your 1992 strategies for campaigning and legislating away. Just like you, they are not useful to the vast majority of people in the third decade of the 21st century.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

in the third decade of the 21st century.

Every millennial in this thread just died a little inside.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Except myself, an elder millennial born on the penultimate day of 82. I'm at peace with being middle aged 😄

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Old people never standing aside and giving the younger generations the opportunities they got. She's part of the reason for the death of the Democrats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I do wonder how this kind of thing will pan out as life extension comes onto the scene...

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 25 points 15 hours ago

I don't fuck wit hoes. Working class or gtfo.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Founding member of house progressive caucus, who has since ceded her power to younger generations, decides to keep running since she’s healthy

Cool story bro

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

House Progressive Caucus is the third-most dishonestly named caucus after the Freedumb Caucus and the Problem Solvers Caucus.

While it DOES indeed contain all the progressives, it also contains a majority of corporate Dems who care about as much about people who don't give them at least $5,000 per election cycle as Donald Trump cares about dogs.

Tbh it should be an invite-only caucus