this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

217 readers
237 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

• Politics

• Science

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
laverabe@lemmy.world
28
As Good As It Gets? The despair of lower-income voters was seen as a political problem rather than an empirical reality (www.nplusonemag.com)
submitted 1 day ago by PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat to c/politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sxan@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm looking forward to reading this. I hadn't thought of it this way before, exactly, but the sentiment resonates.

I mean, it's a fundamental problem with capitalism, and I suspect the only solution is regulation, so in a way I think it is a political problem, but not one of merely trying to appeal to a class of people.

The other problem is, no matter what your messaging, special interests with money will endlessly advertise and twist your actions to appear harmful to the people you're helping. There are armies of Goebbels, trained in state and private education, to twist the truth, and they are employed by companies with endlessly deep pockets. How do you fight that?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 6 points 1 day ago

Especially when those special interests with money take "the economy is very bad, and the Democrats are improving it only in modest ways" and use it to argue, "The Democrats are hurting everyone on purpose, so let's give power to the Republicans instead."

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

Regulation is just a temporary band-aid, it doesn't get to the root of the problem. Disparity will continue to rise and Capitalism will continue to centralize, with power in fewer and fewer hands, until it inevitably collapses.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

great article that really sums up what the fuck happened in this election

The US economy is currently experiencing strong growth, low unemployment, and rising wages - the "stuff of economists' dreams." However, this macroeconomic success has not translated into broad prosperity. Beneath the surface, many workers are struggling with rising costs of living, debt, and declining real wages, especially for low-income households. While the top income brackets thrive, the bottom 40% now account for just 20% of all spending, leading to a deeply unequal and unstable economic recovery. This disconnect between headline economic indicators and the lived experiences of many Americans led to discontent that was reflected in the 2024 election, with voters citing the economy and immigration as key factors. The Democratic Party's focus on macroeconomic performance failed to address the deeper social and economic crises faced by working-class voters, including inflation, job insecurity, and rising costs. The left must confront these issues head-on, rather than dismissing them or resorting to nostalgic historical analogies. Rebuilding a broad and solidaristic left politics will require grappling with the contradictions within the right's fragile coalition, as well as the ways that racism, misogyny, nativism, and other forms of oppression intersect with economic precarity. It is not enough to simply call for "bread and butter" policies; the left must work to mobilize people on different ideological terrain, forging a culture of solidarity that can challenge the uneven terrain of contemporary capitalism.

Summarized by Article-Summarizer

https://github.com/evildevill/Article-Summarizer

https://article-summarize.netlify.app/

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 2 points 1 day ago

Good summary. Agree completely with the article - it actually makes sense out of the blind spot that Dems had in this election. Plus that pointer on how Mexico bucked the worldwide trend theorectically gives Dems a pointer on how to recalibrate and take back the initiative.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is a good examination of what happens when Dems pander to the millionaires while the GOP aims for billionaires. The big spenders will naturally overtake the ability to spend for their message.

The Dems are ignoring the giant bloc of voters for the much smaller but well financed upper-middle class suburbanites. Liberals are causing the left to fail. Progressive politics will win elections.

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 2 points 1 day ago

It seems to me that rather than explicitly trying to listen to the elite and ignore the cries of the common class, the article instead explains that the indicators that Dems were using to get a measure on the economy sort of betrayed them. See for example,

For those focused on short-term macroeconomic indicators like growth and unemployment, that immiseration has been hard to see—and voters’ cries of misery beggared belief.

And also,

rates of homelessness and child poverty predictably resurged. Yet since this was in effect simply a return to the pre-Covid norm, it seems to have barely registered

They saw the traditional indicators said things looked great and rolled with that, instead of digging deeper after a pandemic unprecedented in modern times to see if maybe those traditions had become outdated (as the article hints at).

Overall this is a more positive take, because it means that if Dems just looked at the wrong place and got the wrong idea as a result, they'd be more open making whatever necessary adjustments are needed to avoid a repeat mistake.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 day ago

Progressive politics will win elections.

Owner class will not permit DNC to go this route.